Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: Flat Earthers Only: Scientific Evidence for "Gravity"  (Read 480 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Tradman

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 1247
  • Reputation: +786/-271
  • Gender: Male
Flat Earthers Only: Scientific Evidence for "Gravity"
« on: July 25, 2022, 12:58:14 PM »
  • Thanks!1
  • No Thanks!0


  • Even more proof of flat earth scientific evidence for so-called gravity. Not just density and buoyancy.  With quotes from many scientists throughout the years proving that even they knew there is no such thing as gravity as claimed by controllers of modern science. But the discussion doesn't leave it there. They show how within known physics, the downward tendency of things on earth may actually work, and how modern science theory, which the panel calls a religion, is baseless and absurd. Extensive, understandable, detailed, fascinating.



    Offline Ladislaus

    • Supporter
    • *****
    • Posts: 41912
    • Reputation: +23950/-4345
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Flat Earthers Only: Scientific Evidence for "Gravity"
    « Reply #1 on: July 25, 2022, 01:06:01 PM »
  • Thanks!2
  • No Thanks!0
  • Thanks for posting.  This looks great.  It's very long, though, so I might watch this over a few evenings with my wife (who's also interested in the subject).

    I love that cartoon at the very beginning :laugh1:


    Offline Ladislaus

    • Supporter
    • *****
    • Posts: 41912
    • Reputation: +23950/-4345
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Flat Earthers Only: Scientific Evidence for "Gravity"
    « Reply #2 on: July 25, 2022, 01:11:54 PM »
  • Thanks!1
  • No Thanks!0
  • Is there a Part 1 to this?  He alluded to it early on that this is a continuation of something?

    Offline Tradman

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 1247
    • Reputation: +786/-271
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Flat Earthers Only: Scientific Evidence for "Gravity"
    « Reply #3 on: July 25, 2022, 01:18:03 PM »
  • Thanks!1
  • No Thanks!0
  • Is there a Part 1 to this?  He alluded to it early on that this is a continuation of something?
    He says there is an introduction that covers other support for this theory (a part1 I guess), but I don't remember if the link is provided.  I'm at the end of the presentation so when I'm done, I have to check myself.  I assume it's going to be chronologically available in their lineup. Still, this video stands quite well alone.