Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: Father Pfeiffer slaming Flat Earth, our response  (Read 32502 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Re: Father Pfeiffer slaming Flat Earth, our response
« Reply #135 on: September 24, 2017, 11:41:49 PM »
.
Flat-earthers can't deal with the discussion so they resort to bad-mouthing and mundane platitudes.
.
There is no question they're upset because they know they've lost the substantive argument.
.
The crybably flat-earthers complain without restraint.
.
They cannot answer how someone standing in Australia can see a full moon in the diagram.
.

.
They can't answer the question, so they just keep posting silly nonsense videos they grab from the pile at flat-tards forum, using "Australia" for a search term.
.
Someone standing in Australia in the diagram, looking up, sees not a full moon but the bottom side of a moon that is dark on the bottom since the sun shines from the side across the map.
.
The diagram shows the moon on one side of the earth and the sun on the other side, which produces a full moon phase.
.
We never see the moon that way, with a darkened bottom side. The moon is never dark on the bottom, close to earth.
.
The moon is dark on one side (left or right) but never on the top or the bottom.
.
And whatever the phase of the moon is at a given hour, it is observed in that same phase all over the world, wherever it is visible. 
.
That would be impossible with a so-called flat earth model.
.

Re: Father Pfeiffer slaming Flat Earth, our response
« Reply #136 on: August 24, 2018, 01:51:56 AM »
.
Flat-earthdom syndrome lost this argument a year ago and they haven't been back.
.
Nonetheless, they keep on making the same, monotonous, erroneous statements.
.
It's a corporal work of mercy to instruct the ignorant.
.
But there is a word for the ignorant who refuse to be instructed.
.


Re: Father Pfeiffer slaming Flat Earth, our response
« Reply #137 on: August 24, 2018, 02:09:32 AM »
Are your posts a joke?

Are you actually reading your own posts before you put them up?

You're just throwing around big words to sound intelligent when in fact you are just talking absolute rubbish.

But so you can't say I didn't respond...

They are perfectly reasonable.
 Flat earthers and globalists agree on the circuмference of the earth. Approx 25000 miles.

If the earth is a ball there must be a curvature at a fixed mathematical rate. 8 inches per mile squared. This means logically that after a certain point objects should cease to be visible once they have gone beyond a vanishing point. If you can see objects which you know to be at a certain point beyond that vanishing point, then you have completely undermined they hypothesis that this rate of curvature exists.

IT'S THAT SIMPLE.

The only way you will come to accept this, is to go and do the experiments yourself.

.
A)  Length of the Tropic of Cancer, on 11 December 2015, at 23°26′14″N is 36,788 kilometres (22,859 mi).[3]
.
B)  Length of the Tropic of Capricorn, on 11 June 2015, at 23°26′14″S is 36,788 kilometres (22,859 mi).[4]
.
C)  Please explain how flat-earthers can reconcile the identical lengths of these two lines of latitude on their "flat" earth.
.

Re: Father Pfeiffer slaming Flat Earth, our response
« Reply #138 on: August 24, 2018, 10:15:59 AM »
.
A)  Length of the Tropic of Cancer, on 11 December 2015, at 23°26′14″N is 36,788 kilometres (22,859 mi).[3]
.
B)  Length of the Tropic of Capricorn, on 11 June 2015, at 23°26′14″S is 36,788 kilometres (22,859 mi).[4]
.
C)  Please explain how flat-earthers can reconcile the identical lengths of these two lines of latitude on their "flat" earth.
.
All of this has been provided in the interesting flat earth video thread.  

Re: Father Pfeiffer slaming Flat Earth, our response
« Reply #139 on: August 30, 2018, 02:50:16 PM »
.
I believe it would be pretty interesting to see Fr. Pfeiffer face off with "pastor" Doka in a debate on this topic.
.