CathInfo.com

My observation in the first question is that the boats trailing behind don't converge to a vanishing point, but rather appear to sink into the horizon.  The same observation can be seen in greater detail with binoculars, I can actually see the trailing boats become obscured by the horizon line yet still see details of the masthead.

As for your second question; are you talking about the Vendee globe? If you look at the race route, you will see, that while it is advertised as going around the Antartic, in fact it just goes around the capes.

I admit that this is further on a flat earth map. We are not rigidly attached to the maps, and are open to correction.

The whole race could also be faked.

In any case, it is a man made race, as opposed to a God-made flat horizon with no curvature. The latter always trumps.

Thanks for your reply.  Regarding the first question, I'm going to agree to disagree with you.  I witness first hand the observations reported and those observations conflict with the explanation you are providing.  For myself, I feel it is ok to disagree in this case.

To the second question, this response is interesting.  The course is to leave all the capes to port, so from a globalist perspective sailing around Antarctica would be the same as sailing sailing around the capes, in other words, the course is the same in either description.

I am glad we agree that sailing a course closer to Antarctica would require covering a greater distance than sailing a course closer to the capes.  I'm going to dismiss the notion that the "whole race could be faked" in that this is pure speculation on your part and I could easily dismiss this topic in the same manner.

The final sentence from you in the quote above is the same as comparing apples and oranges, and really doesn't advance your hypothesis in any way.

I would like to thank you for your reply to my questions.