I could be wrong but I almost get the impression that Flat Earthers are in reality sophisticated trollers. If they are not then I must ask how does any of this relate to the Faith? Why are you so strident in your beliefs?

The only way to find out whether this is nonsense is to do your homework; study flat earth.  Get to know both sides of the argument.  In the meantime, flat earth is the truth, so it has everything to do with the Faith.  The Church condemned heliocentrism/spherical earth because that model was contrary to scripture.  This was well known during the Galileo Affair.  When science finally cowed the Church into silence and claimed they'd proven earth to be a moving globe, that Galileo was right, the Church has became the butt of jokes.  This put scripture and the Church in the stupid, archaic realm, totally "behind the times" and utterly mistaken. NASA and pagan science has capitalized on this skepticism of the Church, big time.  They own the microphone and speakers when it comes to the science of the world and the cosmos.  And they are gaining incredible power with the money generated by it.  In fact, heliocentric science has so empowered the Big Banger evolutionists, with the masses literally worshiping false science by pouring billions of dollars into false space programs, evolution, fake global warming endeavours, lies about dwindling resources which must necessarily be limited on an orphan planet (to the advantage of those benefiting from pretend scarce resources).  The entire paganization of earth is utterly dependant on heliocentrism/spherical earth.  The big boys running this operation don't call themselves "globalists" for nothing. The sphere itself is the basis for relativity and consequently, for lies.  After all, level isn't level, its curved.  Up isn't up, its out.  West isn't actually west, its relative.  People are upside down to each other on a globe...and yet, we're all said to be standing upright.  Such lies generate new lies and so on. Flat earth has everything to do with the world because God already told us about our world in scripture.  He described it as having a face, with a dome over it that divides the upper waters from the lower waters, that the sun and moon are lights, not worlds, that the earth has a foundation, it is set on pillars and it can never be moved. Denying what God taught in scripture, what the Catholic Fathers taught, what the Church taught, then it becomes clear, this is a matter of faith, and therefore salvation.  If you wonder why someone might lose their soul over this, remember, the world at large has abandoned what the Church taught and embraced pagan science as their religion-choice for facts.  Oh, and just try to tell them the truth!  They'll literally CRUCIFY you.  If it doesn't matter, why do they get so violent?  The fact is, it does matter.  And it is a religion to many, many people. Interestingly, it also turns out that it is also a matter of corporal life and death.  And the Satanic powers-that-be are sitting fat and happy in their Re-Creation of the world ready to scrape in all the rest of the related monies they can before pulling the plug on the economy and/or going to war to bring about their ultimate goal (because we're so overcrowded): depopulation.  
Yep.  Flat earth matters.    

I could be wrong but I almost get the impression that Flat Earthers are in reality sophisticated trollers. If they are not then I must ask how does any of this relate to the Faith? Why are you so strident in your beliefs?

The reason we are strident is because it is so obviously flat. There is no visible curvature and we can see objects now over the "horizon" with modern cameras, which we should not see. You just have to do the maths.

Relation to faith?;


"On June 22, the Holy Office formally condemns Galileo for heresy:  

“We say, pronounce, sentence and declare that you, the said Galileo...have rendered yourself in the judgment of this Holy office vehemently suspected of heresy, namely, of having believed and held the doctrine which is false and contrary to the Sacred and Divine Scriptures, that the sun is the center of the world and does not move from east to west and that the earth moves and is not the center of the world...."

And the rest at http://flatearthtrads.forumga.net/t60-pertinent-quotes-from-fathers-and-tradition

I could be wrong but I almost get the impression that Flat Earthers are in reality sophisticated trollers. If they are not then I must ask how does any of this relate to the Faith? Why are you so strident in your beliefs?

Trollers, surely, but sophisticated? Give me a break!
.

Where is the link to the video or audio of Fr. Joseph Pfeiffer talking about this earth topic?
.
The only links I can find are those of responses (ridicule videos) to Fr. Pfeiffer.
.

Mr John Anthony Marie,

Boats disappear hull first. This is true, but they remain a the same level. The mast should descend, but does not.

Here is a video illustrating this...




The answer why they do this is simply because objects get smaller and descend as they go further away, and there must be a point where they "merge" with the sky.

This video gives some good illustrations explaining how this common sense principle works.
No need to watch it all, if you don't want to. Skipping to the pictures will give you an idea of how it works.

My observation in the first question is that the boats trailing behind don't converge to a vanishing point, but rather appear to sink into the horizon.  The same observation can be seen in greater detail with binoculars, I can actually see the trailing boats become obscured by the horizon line yet still see details of the masthead.

As for your second question; are you talking about the Vendee globe? If you look at the race route, you will see, that while it is advertised as going around the Antartic, in fact it just goes around the capes.

I admit that this is further on a flat earth map. We are not rigidly attached to the maps, and are open to correction.

The whole race could also be faked.

In any case, it is a man made race, as opposed to a God-made flat horizon with no curvature. The latter always trumps.

Thanks for your reply.  Regarding the first question, I'm going to agree to disagree with you.  I witness first hand the observations reported and those observations conflict with the explanation you are providing.  For myself, I feel it is ok to disagree in this case.

To the second question, this response is interesting.  The course is to leave all the capes to port, so from a globalist perspective sailing around Antarctica would be the same as sailing sailing around the capes, in other words, the course is the same in either description.

I am glad we agree that sailing a course closer to Antarctica would require covering a greater distance than sailing a course closer to the capes.  I'm going to dismiss the notion that the "whole race could be faked" in that this is pure speculation on your part and I could easily dismiss this topic in the same manner.

The final sentence from you in the quote above is the same as comparing apples and oranges, and really doesn't advance your hypothesis in any way.

I would like to thank you for your reply to my questions.