Great stuff. The infinite gap between nothing and something is very much overlooked by those in the evolutionist camp. And then when they try to pull the Aristotelian "eternal universe" angle, you just have to point out that it's impossible for there to be any change without a First Cause.
Yeah, they gloss over that part. So how did all this complexity of life come from nothing? They try to mask it by claiming, well, first it was just nothing that exploding into untold amounts of matter (even though that's philosphically impossible). Then the random swirling organized itself. Evolution is utterly preposterous every step of the way.
I posted a video on the other thread that basically proved that even for a SINGLE CELL to form would be absolutely impossible through randomness and chance. And from there you'd have to have this single cell somehow being smart enough to reproduce itself, and then the other cells it reproduced with would organize and work together somehow to form a more complex organism It's absolutely and utterly ludicrous.
But here's how people get snookered. They're shown pictures of animals that look similar to each other. And, ironically, the SUDDENLY find themselves in tune with statistics because, the odds are so low that two similar creatures would evolve independently, that one of them must have come from the other. They never consider the possibility that the similarity (the common design) is due to having a common designer.
Bottom line: evolution is only believed by those who either 1) want to accept it because they simply don't want to believe in God and/or 2) they are simply dumbed down in school and believe the propaganda
Topic: Evolution debunked in five minutes (Read 4273 times)