Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: End of Story at least for Catholics  (Read 31519 times)

0 Members and 4 Guests are viewing this topic.

Re: End of Story at least for Catholics
« Reply #135 on: October 19, 2017, 11:57:50 AM »
How about Globus Cruciger? A christian symbol of authority since the Middle Ages.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Salvator_Mundi#/media/File:Carlo_Crivelli,_salvatore,_c._1470,_El_Paso_Museum_of_Art.jpg


Re: End of Story at least for Catholics
« Reply #136 on: October 21, 2017, 10:05:06 AM »
How about Globus Cruciger? A christian symbol of authority since the Middle Ages.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Salvator_Mundi#/media/File:Carlo_Crivelli,_salvatore,_c._1470,_El_Paso_Museum_of_Art.jpg
Quote
"The ball was supposed to represent the earth, with the cross on top representing Christ's dominion over it, and the sovereign would hold it to show that "he's got the whole world in his hands." The earliest of these dates to the fifth century, before the fall of Rome, and they were used throughout the Middle Ages. In fact, orbs without the cross were common for centuries beforehand. Thus, any claim that the ancients or medievals thought the earth was flat can't even get started." 



Re: End of Story at least for Catholics
« Reply #137 on: October 21, 2017, 11:32:06 AM »
You're wasting your time, Myrna.  These people are like Feeneyites.  It's a dogma to them that will not change no matter what the Church, science, or reality says.

Re: End of Story at least for Catholics
« Reply #138 on: October 21, 2017, 11:52:06 AM »
You're wasting your time, Myrna.  These people are like Feeneyites.  It's a dogma to them that will not change no matter what the Church, science, or reality says.
Cheap, and unjust, comparison.

Re: End of Story at least for Catholics
« Reply #139 on: October 21, 2017, 11:55:37 AM »
Hmm...It seems to me flatEarthers are more like those who reject the EENS Dogma. Elevating to Dogma that which is not; eg. claiming that suprema haec is dogmatic when it clearly contradicts many infallible teachings and perfectly coincides with V2 heresy.
Glad you're "feelin' scrappy" man, cuz I'm not. It's all too "lather, rinse, and repeat" tiresome, not to mention more than a bit "Jewfinger".

The squeaky wheels get the rest of us greased, in a forties gangster sorta way.

Of course, it's also dishonest, manipulative, and a bit bullying to even use words like "Feeneyite" in the first place.

Each time it's responded to  just gives weight to falsehood.

Did I mention "effeminate"?