Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: End of Story at least for Catholics  (Read 31542 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Re: End of Story at least for Catholics
« Reply #120 on: October 10, 2017, 11:13:21 AM »
Student of Qi,

A good analysis? Would you mind telling me exactly what was good about his analysis?

So far as I could see he failed to explain why we were seeing so much (500feet) of the mountain.

Please do elaborate.


On a general point to everyone, the attempt to make flat earthers look stupid won't work. Our case is thoroughly scientific, thoroughly doctrinal and thoroughly scriptural.

The following users need not respond to my posts anymore because they have shown themselves to be incapable of rational discussion about this topic;

Neil Obstat,
DZ Please,
Even Seven,
Myrna.

I'm not going to spend the whole day digging up the old posts, but Neil pointed out various ways that the measurments were not fully accurate, like putting the camera on the sand and saying that was sea level. Of course, he likely couldn't put the camera on top of tge water or there would never be a video!
Can't say I remember his response to the 500 ft. contention but, I vaguely remember being of the opinion that it was a logical conclision.
Anyway, Neils thoughts aside from present, off the original topic discusion, why does this video presented not align with what I saw multiple times at my Uncle's place? (See my previous post) Presuming no errant presentation on either side, why does the island not disappear in tge video but the ships and riggs disappear before my eyes?
   How would this be possible on one part of the world and not another???

Re: End of Story at least for Catholics
« Reply #121 on: October 10, 2017, 11:36:24 AM »
Anyway, Neils thoughts aside from present, off the original topic discusion, why does this video presented not align with what I saw multiple times at my Uncle's place? (See my previous post) Presuming no errant presentation on either side, why does the island not disappear in tge video but the ships and riggs disappear before my eyes?

Being you are obviously engaging with the things of nature, using your senses in unison to formulate a conclusion, which some of us refer to as "common sense," you are somehow a "agent of NASA."

I'd find it most interesting, to know what type of professions and hobbies FEer's partake in...


Re: End of Story at least for Catholics
« Reply #122 on: October 10, 2017, 11:43:38 AM »
Thanks for not "black listing" me... too kind!
:jester:
:jester: :jester:

Re: End of Story at least for Catholics
« Reply #123 on: October 10, 2017, 11:43:45 AM »

Can't say I remember his response to the 500 ft. contention but, I vaguely remember being of the opinion that it was a logical conclision.
Anyway, Neils thoughts aside from present, off the original topic discusion, why does this video presented not align with what I saw multiple times at my Uncle's place? (See my previous post) Presuming no errant presentation on either side, why does the island not disappear in tge video but the ships and riggs disappear before my eyes?
   How would this be possible on one part of the world and not another???

Well the point is that he did not have anything to say in response to the 500 ft contention, and it is a pretty bit contention!

As for your uncles place, this does not have much to do with this video. The reason you see more when you go up is simply because you have a greater perspective of the flat earth. The point of the video I posted is to show something that is physically impossible according to the mathematics of the globe earth. It completely undermines it.

The same is illustrated in this video


Re: End of Story at least for Catholics
« Reply #124 on: October 10, 2017, 11:50:43 AM »
Not
A
Silly 
A$#)&%