Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: End of Story at least for Catholics  (Read 33864 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Re: End of Story at least for Catholics
« Reply #95 on: October 09, 2017, 03:48:13 PM »
.
That stupid video again.
.
It's all fake, and I've gone through it almost minute by minute already exposing the lies. The guy deliberately falsifies his pictures and you can even see what he's doing to make it look other than what it was when he shot the photos.
.
So transparent it's not funny.
.
He has his distances, elevations and observations all wrong. Pathetic.
.
This thread was started to go over another topic entirely and now it's turned into the same old nonsense.
.
Baptism of Desire syndrome all over again! That's what happens when you allow lunatics to get control of an internet forum.
.

Re: End of Story at least for Catholics
« Reply #96 on: October 09, 2017, 04:01:47 PM »
.
That stupid video again.
.
It's all fake, and I've gone through it almost minute by minute already exposing the lies. The guy deliberately falsifies his pictures and you can even see what he's doing to make it look other than what it was when he shot the photos.
.
So transparent it's not funny.
.
He has his distances, elevations and observations all wrong. Pathetic.
.
This thread was started to go over another topic entirely and now it's turned into the same old nonsense.
.
Baptism of Desire syndrome all over again! That's what happens when you allow lunatics to get control of an internet forum.
.
Yes, Mr. Neil, surely everyone is aware these types of threads always get derailed. That is probably part of the reason thet are all in one place. And Yes, I've seen your analyses of the video and I think it a good one.
BDS is a good term to be noted for the vocabulary. Can we put it in a dictionary? Maybe C.I. could form it's own encyclopedic dictionary of terms used over the years.


Re: End of Story at least for Catholics
« Reply #97 on: October 09, 2017, 04:16:36 PM »
.
This is incredible.
.


Quote from: Student of Qi on Today at 11:50:09 AM
Quote

If we are to take this by personal experience, then mine contradicts what is seen in this man's video. When I was little we would sometimes go to Galveston and stay at a house my uncle would rent. I don't know the exact height, but adding the sea-wall and a two to three story building means I would have been about the equivalent of five stories up. Anyway, from the top story window you could see ships and even rigs out in the Gulf, but when you got down to the sand you couldn't see them anymore. It seems my experience conflicts with this video. 

If you would have used binoculars and a zoom camera just a few feet above ground level, you still would have been able to see the ships .
.
Flat-earthers are so myopic it's predictable.  
.
He just told you that he could see the ships without binoculars from the top story window at 5 stories up, so why do you think that when he goes down to the sand -- which is CLOSER to the ships! -- that he would need binoculars to see them?  :facepalm:
.

Re: End of Story at least for Catholics
« Reply #98 on: October 09, 2017, 04:21:48 PM »
.
This is incredible.
.

If you would have used binoculars and a zoom camera just a few feet above ground level, you still would have been able to see the ships .

.
Flat-earthers are so myopic it's predictable.  
.
He just told you that he could see the ships without binoculars from the top story window at 5 stories up, so why do you think that when he goes down to the sand -- which is CLOSER to the ships! -- that he would need binoculars to see them?  :facepalm:
.
Perspective,

Re: End of Story at least for Catholics
« Reply #99 on: October 09, 2017, 04:22:06 PM »
Yes, Mr. Neil, surely everyone is aware these types of threads always get derailed. That is probably part of the reason thet are all in one place. And Yes, I've seen your analyses of the video and I think it a good one.
BDS is a good term to be noted for the vocabulary. Can we put it in a dictionary? Maybe C.I. could form it's own encyclopedic dictionary of terms used over the years.
Impossible.  Liberals define words the same way as the Humpty Dumpty uses words:  

Quote
 “When I use a word,” Humpty Dumpty said, in rather a scornful tone, “it means just what I choose it to mean—neither more nor less.”