CathInfo.com

Sungenis is using a soft opening checking opposition to his model.  After speaking with him, it is clear that he has no solid evidence earth is a globe, but only remains his opinion.  700 pages of opinion he cannot prove.  He knows little to nothing about the Fathers of the Church and their writings on the subject.  He insists Scripture must be interpreted literally when it comes to moving earth, but not literally when it comes to earth's shape.  He thinks man went to the moon, or, if they didn't, then maybe NASA lied, but NASA doesn't always lie and he uses a lot of data from them. Sadly, every answer he provides directly or through his side-kick Rick Delano, he is unable to deal with the physical or spiritual questions coming at him.  I seriously doubt it's even possible for someone who's written two books and produced a movie supporting the globe can ever permit the truth to penetrate long enough to seriously consider the particulars involved.  I'm still waiting for answers to questions.  

Did you not watch the interview?

He's plain in saying he's a hired hand. He was paid to write the book by Hugh Owen.


Owen gave him a 30+ page manuscript and he expanded it to 700+.


Thing is, he doesn't understand the basic flat earth model (which is not complicated at all). He literally cannot articulate it in his own words. This makes right thinking observers such as Happenby question the thoroughness of his research.


Collating information from other writers into a volume and slapping your name on it does not make you knowledgeable.

That said, I'd read it.

Thing is, he doesn't understand the basic flat earth model (which is not complicated at all).
He literally cannot articulate it in his own words.
This makes right thinking observers such as Happenby question the thoroughness of his research.