Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: Dr. Kent Hovind and Robert Sungenis on "Flat Earth, Flat Wrong!"  (Read 6195 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Yeti

  • Supporter
Re: Dr. Kent Hovind and Robert Sungenis on "Flat Earth, Flat Wrong!"
« Reply #5 on: June 09, 2022, 11:08:27 AM »
In any case, why not choose the Infant of Prague and His globe? Jesus would definitely know what the shape of the earth is, after all. ::)

Re: Dr. Kent Hovind and Robert Sungenis on "Flat Earth, Flat Wrong!"
« Reply #6 on: June 09, 2022, 11:14:08 AM »
In any case, why not choose the Infant of Prague and His globe? Jesus would definitely know what the shape of the earth is, after all. ::)
He speaks about why he chose this picture for the cover of his book and the significance of the globe in the picture and the globe in other religious iconography of the Middle Ages from 3:33 to 6:10.


Re: Dr. Kent Hovind and Robert Sungenis on "Flat Earth, Flat Wrong!"
« Reply #7 on: June 09, 2022, 06:41:57 PM »
So I started looking at this video.  Sungenis admits that there are some very intelligent men with solid arguments that do make it appear as though the earth is flat, that it doesn't suffice just to brush it off, and that his original 30-page paper turned into a 700+ page book.

Lad, I'm glad you started looking at the video.  I would appreciate any final comments you have concerning its content if you would care to provide.

Re: Dr. Kent Hovind and Robert Sungenis on "Flat Earth, Flat Wrong!"
« Reply #8 on: June 09, 2022, 08:01:23 PM »


"People say that DaVinci was into the occult and had ties to Masonry"

Bingo!  I think you're picking-up a scent...


                          Walker Coon Hound

Re: Dr. Kent Hovind and Robert Sungenis on "Flat Earth, Flat Wrong!"
« Reply #9 on: June 10, 2022, 03:04:29 PM »
Hmm... I wonder how this thread ended up being dominated by the discussion of a picture on the cover of a book.  An exception to the rule about not being able to judge a book by its cover?!