Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: Dr. John D destroys the Globe  (Read 8076 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Re: Dr. John D destroys the Globe
« Reply #40 on: July 23, 2022, 10:54:59 AM »
ʝʊdɛօ-Masonic controlled NASA can't get to the Moon with a rocket and neither can anybody else. Not communist Jew-pinched China either. Rockets don't have the velocity, the power, or the fuel capacity or design features to make it there. And there are no so-called "gravity-kicks". Newton's theory of "gravity" is garbage and so is Einstein's theory of relativity. 

Averroes in Tahafut al-Tahafut, The Incoherence of the Incoherence, is at least based in Hellenistic geocentrism, and writes in passing, "Therefore the body with straight surfaces must end in the circuмscribing circular body, since this is the perfect body which is liable neither to increase nor to decrease. Therefore when the mind seeks to imagine that the circular body must end in another body (like some sort of flat Earth), it imagines the impossible. These are all matters of which the mutakallemim of the camel jockeys and those who do not start their inquiry in the proper scientific order are unaware."

Which means that in view of the infinity of God and the 3-D quality of space, a flat Earth does not make good sense for the sake of the relation which it evidently has to everything else.

Offline Tradman

  • Supporter
Re: Dr. John D destroys the Globe
« Reply #41 on: July 25, 2022, 10:44:06 AM »
ʝʊdɛօ-Masonic controlled NASA can't get to the Moon with a rocket and neither can anybody else. Not communist Jєω-pinched China either. Rockets don't have the velocity, the power, or the fuel capacity or design features to make it there. And there are no so-called "gravity-kicks". Newton's theory of "gravity" is garbage and so is Einstein's theory of relativity.

Averroes in Tahafut al-Tahafut, The Incoherence of the Incoherence, is at least based in Hellenistic geocentrism, and writes in passing, "Therefore the body with straight surfaces must end in the circuмscribing circular body, since this is the perfect body which is liable neither to increase nor to decrease. Therefore when the mind seeks to imagine that the circular body must end in another body (like some sort of flat Earth), it imagines the impossible. These are all matters of which the mutakallemim of the camel jockeys and those who do not start their inquiry in the proper scientific order are unaware."

Which means that in view of the infinity of God and the 3-D quality of space, a flat Earth does not make good sense for the sake of the relation which it evidently has to everything else.
One of the most ridiculous notions out there is people who think earth is a geocentric ball hanging stationary in space. All because some pagan says the perfect body must be a sphere? Out of what hole do people climb who adhere to drawing such a conclusion? Where are the pillars that infallible scripture describes support the earth if earth is a ball?  Picture that anomaly. How is a dome able to cover a ball shaped earth as scripture describes?  How can the earth have cardinal directions if it's a ball?  Where does east or west or north or south even begin on a ball? Where do they end? Who says? Why does scripture describe the ends of the earth when in fact earth has no ends if earth is a ball?  How does a hanging ball in space believer explain gravity without earth spin? Where does scripture ever describe a ball earth? How can the sun travel ridiculous numbers of miles in a mere 24 hour period while going around earth? The stars, even further out, travel faster and farther in the same amount of time?  How does a ball have a face, as scripture describes? The incoherence of incoherence attempting to use the word "circuмscribing" to represent the shape of a ball is worst of all.  Circuмscribing has nothing to do with outlining a ball, but rather, a circle, so even the statement itself is untenable.        


Online Ladislaus

  • Supporter
Re: Dr. John D destroys the Globe
« Reply #42 on: July 25, 2022, 10:57:32 AM »
Newton's theory of "gravity" is garbage and so is Einstein's theory of relativity.

Most of modern "science" is total garbage, made up in the service of the Judaeo-Masonic agenda.  They come up with these theories, and then present them as established fact to the younger generations in grade school to program their minds.

Re: Dr. John D destroys the Globe
« Reply #43 on: July 25, 2022, 03:55:05 PM »
Most of modern "science" is total garbage, made up in the service of the Judaeo-Masonic agenda.  They come up with these theories, and then present them as established fact to the younger generations in grade school to program their minds.
It's philosophy, honestly. Once Einstein came along and kick-started "theoretical physics", we've been seeing philosophy through the language of mathematics being dressed up as cosmological "truth". Very little, if any of it, it proven through the scientific method.

In another way, it almost serves as a sort of naturalistic "theology" for the grand cult of Scientism

Online Ladislaus

  • Supporter
Re: Dr. John D destroys the Globe
« Reply #44 on: July 25, 2022, 04:56:30 PM »
It's philosophy, honestly. Once Einstein came along and kick-started "theoretical physics", we've been seeing philosophy through the language of mathematics being dressed up as cosmological "truth". Very little, if any of it, it proven through the scientific method.

In another way, it almost serves as a sort of naturalistic "theology" for the grand cult of Scientism

There's some correspondence between Darwin and Lowell about evolution, and they both openly state that there are huge holes in their respective theories (Lowell was more focused on geology and proving old earth millions of years old), but they basically admitted that they didn't care, and that their intent was to gut Christianity.

In the higher-level academic circles (universities, etc.), MANY even-mainstream scholars are questioning evolution.  But it's still presented as proven fact to school children, and other theories are largely forbidden to be taught.  I even saw where one top scholars who is an atheist stated that he had no other options but to conclude Intelligent Design, but, when asked about whether he believed in God and stopped being an atheist, he said that he wouldn't go quite that far.