Author Topic: Dr. John D destroys the Globe (Read 8055 times)

Donachie · « **Reply #25 on:** July 21, 2022, 12:30:20 AM »

Quote from: Cera on July 20, 2022, 05:28:44 PM

You raise an interesting question. If the Moon were a sphere, why do we see only one side of it? Does that seem logical to you? (I predict that you will go to your pal Google to assist with your "response" instead of using your own brain.)

You're projecting, which is not quite necessary, but I think that the Moon is a complete sphere. There are librations of the Moon that add to the evidence that it's a sphere. It has a spherical appearance to me and to just about everybody else. I'd say its sphericity is evidently true and universally acknowledged.

It does not rotate is why one side is seen from Earth. The Earth is spherical too and does not rotate either.

If you consider nature and sides, having seen one side, one could consider that the other side is similar to it, and fully spherical too. That would be most natural. So not having seen the other side, I assume that the other side is as spherical and similar to the side we see. If one has half an orange and the other is missing, he can assume that the missing half was similar. It would be unnatural for oranges and objects like the Moon or Earth or Jupiter to be in odd halves.

DigitalLogos · « **Reply #26 on:** July 21, 2022, 11:51:37 AM »

Quote from: Donachie on July 21, 2022, 12:30:20 AM

You're projecting, which is not quite necessary, but I think that the Moon is a complete sphere. There are librations of the Moon that add to the evidence that it's a sphere. It has a spherical appearance to me and to just about everybody else. I'd say its sphericity is evidently true and universally acknowledged.

It does not rotate is why one side is seen from Earth. The Earth is spherical too and does not rotate either.

If you consider nature and sides, having seen one side, one could consider that the other side is similar to it, and fully spherical too. That would be most natural. So not having seen the other side, I assume that the other side is as spherical and similar to the side we see. If one has half an orange and the other is missing, he can assume that the missing half was similar. It would be unnatural for oranges and objects like the Moon or Earth or Jupiter to be in odd halves.

This channel has some peculiar, but very interesting, theories about the moon

Cera · « **Reply #27 on:** July 21, 2022, 12:49:47 PM »

Quote from: Donachie on July 21, 2022, 12:30:20 AM

If you consider nature and sides, having seen one side, one could consider that the other side is similar to it, and fully spherical too. That would be most natural. So not having seen the other side, I assume that the other side is as spherical and similar to the side we see. If one has half an orange and the other is missing, he can assume that the missing half was similar. It would be unnatural for oranges and objects like the Moon or Earth or Jupiter to be in odd halves.

I respect that you are geocentric; sorry I missed that.

You say "having seen one side, one could consider that the other side is similar to it, and fully spherical too." On the other hand, having seen one side we cannot tell if it is a sphere or not. Although it goes against millenia of Egyptian/Freemasonic programming, it could be flat or it could be a sphere.

I make no assumption about the supposed "other side." It may be flat or it may be a sphere. Our unstated basic assumptions will cause us to lean toward either flat or sphere.

Somtimes we have to overcome our unstated basic assumptions about the world in which we live, considering the many lies we've been told. You know that because you are not heliocentric.