This is ultimately the goal of introducing Coepernicus/Galileo, that GOD somehow errored in creating the earth..

https://www.flightradar24.com/23.02,-43.79/2

Live flight air tracker. Zoom out. No flights over poles.

These might be of interest.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polar_route
https://www.cntraveler.com/story/why-airplanes-sometimes-fly-over-the-north-pole
https://aviation.stackexchange.com/questions/11449/why-does-no-aircraft-cross-directly-over-the-pole

Ok, but the explanation for how the sun works on a flat earth and whether the earth actually has curvature are very different things.

Did you get time to catch the video I posted about there being no 24 hour sun in Antartica?

No, I didn't see that video ... just the one about the 3 days of sun near the Arctic.

Why would anyone want to fly over the poles?  Also, flat earth wouldn't prevent anyone from flying over the north pole.

The pole route could be shorter in some cases making it desirable.
Not all proposed flat earth models have north in the center. Moses, Enoch and Cosmas say earth is twice as wide east to west as it is north to south. In fact, if you go to Google Earth, center Africa. Then swipe down, Africa goes to the other side. Swipe down again, Africa returns. Center Africa again. Swipe sideways, swipe again. You have to swipe a third time for Africa to fully reappear. That is proof enough that Google is pulling a fast one because inhabitable earth as we know it cannot possibly be a ball.

.
The Google Earth view of the planet is not optically correct, but makes the surface appear as it would with a wide-angle lens, which is why you can't see close to the edges. The center image is enlarged more than the perimeter. It is as though viewed from about 300 miles high, which is not high enough to see the 180-degree view of the earth's face from one vantage point.
.
When you see Africa in the center, you should be able to see the east coast of South America on the left side and the west coast of India on the right. But you can't. That's because the view is not wide enough. 
.
You should also see Antarctica at the bottom and the North Sea, and Iceland at the top. But you can't.
.
It doesn't "prove" anything.
.

.
The Google Earth view of the planet is not optically correct, but makes the surface appear as it would with a wide-angle lens, which is why you can't see close to the edges. The center image is enlarged more than the perimeter. It is as though viewed from about 300 miles high, which is not high enough to see the 180-degree view of the earth's face from one vantage point.
.
When you see Africa in the center, you should be able to see the east coast of South America on the left side and the west coast of India on the right. But you can't. That's because the view is not wide enough.
.
You should also see Antarctica at the bottom and the North Sea, and Iceland at the top. But you can't.
.
It doesn't "prove" anything.
.

So some say. The convenience of the back tracking and obfuscation by modern science is epic. They never said such a thing when they posted pics of their official cgi globes over the past 50 years

And what is the pic you've posted but a cartoon. Where's the real globe earth photo?

.
That isn't a "photo." It's a geographically correct image of the earth composed by precise measurement and mapping which is possible without space travel. Globe models have been widely in use long before the advent of photography so that obviates the "photo" issue.
.
Planetary geodetic surveying established the true contours of all the continents within small limits of error using modern technology which only more accurately refined what had already been defined by much more crude means. 
.
You don't know much about history, do you? And you're not really interested, correct?
.

You talk, you claim, but you do not cite, source, or quote.  So basically, we're relying on your opinion.  Remember, the pagan globalists of at least the past 500 are in question here, along with the modern ones destroying with their nєω ωσrℓ∂ σr∂єr.  What's fascinating in these threads is that I quote scripture, Popes, Saints, and Catholics, with sources, and I get hammered with every kind of detraction.  You post sentences, without sources, without explanation, and... crickets.  Sometimes, when looking for truth in murky setting, its the little things.  

.
Do you want sources?
.
They won't be Scriptural, so forget that.
.
I know that's all you'll accept, so why bother.
.
Where does the Bible define the speed of light or the colors of the rainbow?
.
Tell us where the Bible lists in order the philosophical categories of being.
.
Where, oh where does Scripture pronounce on the relative electrical conductivity of silicon and gold?
.
These things are observable with our 5 senses and with the use of human reason.
.
Just like the sphericity of the earth is knowable by same.
.