Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: Did Catholics before the "Reformation" believe in FE?  (Read 47215 times)

0 Members and 4 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline kiwiboy

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 518
  • Reputation: +217/-455
  • Gender: Male
Re: Did Catholics before the "Reformation" believe in FE?
« Reply #195 on: December 01, 2017, 06:49:37 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • It was quite clear to me, even in the English translation, that St. Thomas wrote of the spherical earth as one who accepted it as true and took it for granted.  This would be even clearer in the Latin because in that language the verb of contrafactual clauses is written in subjunctive rather than indicative mood.   I have not even heard of a scholar who suggests that St. Thomas did not believe in the globe earth.  There is nothing dishonest about me understanding a passage in the way that many (probably most) other people understand it.

    As for the quotes, ultimately it does not matter whether or not they all show support for flat earth as you think.  What we need to be looking for in quotes from the Fathers regarding flat earth is the author's indication that he is writing about a matter faith.  If not, it is merely his personal opinion about natural science and not binding on us at all.  Can you produce quotes that say this is a matter of faith?
    It seems pretty clear that St. Augustine taught that these kind of questions are not a matter of faith:

    The latin tenses are irrelevant.

    St. Thomas is merely quoting Aristotle. This is all. We do not know one way or another what he thought. All I say is that it is dishonest to claim that his quotes show it. STOP LYING PLEASE.


    Did you even read the quote you yourself gave of St. Augustine????

    He is talking about DIFFERENT FLAT EARTH MODELS.

    But when it comes to the suggestion that the earth is ball, he is clearly against it. MORE DISHONESTY.

    You have said that you are relying on your husband for science. Ordinarily that would be a good thing. But it this case you should think for yourself. He is certainly not going to be disciplining you for thinking the globe earth error, even if he probably should. So you should be courageous and make a stand on this.

    It is still not too late jaynek to turn around...


    Offline Jaynek

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 4161
    • Reputation: +2305/-1228
    • Gender: Female
    Re: Did Catholics before the "Reformation" believe in FE?
    « Reply #196 on: December 01, 2017, 06:50:06 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • I will also add for the sake of HONEST readers of this thread, that I don't agree with my fellow flat earthers that scripture "proves" flat earth.

    It makes much more sense when you know the truth of flat earth, and one can certainly be of the opinion theologically that it is contained in it, but it doesn't prove it in a SCIENTIFIC sense. No more than you can take a cooking recipe from a book on physics.

    Jaynek, if cardinal bellarmine was of the opinion that truths on Gods creation were de fide, then ordinary lay people can be of that opinion also. Most especially when modern technology can show it to be true.
    I do not have a problem with your position, if you come to it based on science.  I do not know (or care) enough about the science to express an opinion.  

    Cardinal Bellarmine wrote his opinion that truths on God's creation were de fide before popes had written encyclicals saying otherwise.  There was nothing wrong with him writing that, but for us now, we are bound to follow the papal teaching.  Lay people might not be aware of the encyclicals, so it is not sinful for them to disobey them in ignorance, but once they have been informed, lay people are obliged to follow the Church teaching.


    Offline kiwiboy

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 518
    • Reputation: +217/-455
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Did Catholics before the "Reformation" believe in FE?
    « Reply #197 on: December 01, 2017, 06:52:28 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • I do not have a problem with your position, if you come to it based on science.  I do not know (or care) enough about the science to express an opinion. 

    Cardinal Bellarmine wrote his opinion that truths on God's creation were de fide before popes had written encyclicals saying otherwise.  There was nothing wrong with him writing that, but for us now, we are bound to follow the papal teaching.  Lay people might not be aware of the encyclicals, so it is not sinful for them to disobey them in ignorance, but once they have been informed, lay people are obliged to follow the Church teaching.

    Even theologians in tradition don't have a clear idea whether these encyclicals are binding. The reason being the erroneous encyclicals of modern popes. Sedes claim of course, that this is because they are not real popes.

    Are you a sede Jaynek?

    Offline Jaynek

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 4161
    • Reputation: +2305/-1228
    • Gender: Female
    Re: Did Catholics before the "Reformation" believe in FE?
    « Reply #198 on: December 01, 2017, 07:09:44 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • These are just links to wikipedia pages about the people!

    There's nothing in it about them saying the earth is a globe!

    This is the kind of intellectual dishonest I am well used to with globers.

    I do not doubt that many of the people thought the earth was a globe. But I have seen far too many times quotations being mistranslated and misunderstood.

    By the way, exactly what did you "appreciate" Jaynek about even stevens posts in the thread on the fathers??? Was it his total dishonesty which I exposed?
    Yes, it is unfortunate that the list of people who believed in a globe earth did not have quotes that we could examine ourselves.  I would have preferred that too.  You are quite right that in its current form we can't be sure.

    I thought that An Even Seven made legitimate points.  I was not convinced that there was anything dishonest about them.

    Offline kiwiboy

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 518
    • Reputation: +217/-455
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Did Catholics before the "Reformation" believe in FE?
    « Reply #199 on: December 01, 2017, 07:41:16 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • But he failed to disprove my point: That the majority of Fathers where they spoke on the issue were against the globe earth.


    Offline kiwiboy

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 518
    • Reputation: +217/-455
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Did Catholics before the "Reformation" believe in FE?
    « Reply #200 on: December 01, 2017, 07:51:25 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • To clarify another point I made earlier.

    Scripture can be used to prove theologically, but just not in a physical and scientific way.

    Offline Jaynek

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 4161
    • Reputation: +2305/-1228
    • Gender: Female
    Re: Did Catholics before the "Reformation" believe in FE?
    « Reply #201 on: December 01, 2017, 08:13:45 AM »
  • Thanks!1
  • No Thanks!0
  • The latin tenses are irrelevant.

    St. Thomas is merely quoting Aristotle. This is all. We do not know one way or another what he thought. All I say is that it is dishonest to claim that his quotes show it. STOP LYING PLEASE.
    Here is the sentence in English: 

    Quote
    The physicist proves the earth to be round by one means, the astronomer by another: for the latter proves this by means of mathematics, e.g. by the shapes of eclipses, or something of the sort; while the former proves it by means of physics, e.g. by the movement of heavy bodies towards the center, and so forth. 
    And here it is in Latin:

    Quote
    Ad secundum dicendum quod terram esse rotundam per aliud medium demonstrat naturalis, et per aliud astrologus, astrologus enim hoc demonstrat per media mathematica, sicut per figuras eclipsium, vel per aliud huiusmodi; naturalis vero hoc demonstrat per medium naturale, sicut per motum gravium ad medium, vel per aliud huiusmodi. 

    Subjunctive and indicative are moods, not tenses, and it is relevant because it shows whether St. Thomas is saying something that he himself believes.

    In English, when I say "I am a Catholic" I am stating a fact and using "am" which is indicative mood.  When someone says "were I a Catholic" he is referring something contrary to fact (he is not a Catholic) and using "were" which is subjunctive mood.  Latin uses the subjunctive much more than English and in many more grammatical constructions. 

    The phrase "quod terram esse rotundam per aliud medium demonstrat" has its verb "demonstrat" in the indicative which means the author believes it is a fact.  If he were alluding to something that he himself did not believe it would be in the subjunctive.  There is no ambiguity about this in the original Latin.

    Offline Jaynek

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 4161
    • Reputation: +2305/-1228
    • Gender: Female
    Re: Did Catholics before the "Reformation" believe in FE?
    « Reply #202 on: December 01, 2017, 08:27:45 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Did you even read the quote you yourself gave of St. Augustine????

    He is talking about DIFFERENT FLAT EARTH MODELS.

    But when it comes to the suggestion that the earth is ball, he is clearly against it. MORE DISHONESTY.

    You have said that you are relying on your husband for science. Ordinarily that would be a good thing. But it this case you should think for yourself. He is certainly not going to be disciplining you for thinking the globe earth error, even if he probably should. So you should be courageous and make a stand on this.

    It is still not too late jaynek to turn around...
    I was not suggesting that St. Augustine believed the earth is a ball.  It seems to me that the quote is saying that questions about the shape and form of physical objects are not a matter of faith and that it can even be harmful to the faith to talk about it too much.

    My husband will not spank me if I were to start believing the earth is flat.  He would probably, however, no longer allow me to read trad forums.  Much more importantly, he would lose all respect for trads and our views on anything and probably stop attending the TLM with me.  I fail to see how the shape of the earth is more important than my husband's salvation.  It is part of my duty as a wife to do all in my power to aid his salvation.  I am under no obligation at all to have an opinion on the shape of the earth.  There is nothing courageous about what you suggest.


    Offline happenby

    • Sr. Member
    • ****
    • Posts: 2768
    • Reputation: +1077/-1637
    • Gender: Female
    Re: Did Catholics before the "Reformation" believe in FE?
    « Reply #203 on: December 01, 2017, 08:30:51 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • One always needs to take the anti-Catholic propaganda of Protestants with a grain of salt.  In this particular case Wikipedia writes:

    But let's pretend that it is a credible source.  Even if all the people he claimed taught against antipodes actually did, unless they identified if as a matter of faith, it would not be a Church teaching.  Matters of natural science with no bearing on faith cannot be teachings of the Church.
    There's no need to pretend, no need to guess, anything held  by the Church for over a thousand years "always, everywhere, and by all," is doctrine.  Don't take my word for it, go look it up. 

    Offline happenby

    • Sr. Member
    • ****
    • Posts: 2768
    • Reputation: +1077/-1637
    • Gender: Female
    Re: Did Catholics before the "Reformation" believe in FE?
    « Reply #204 on: December 01, 2017, 08:36:56 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • It was quite clear to me, even in the English translation, that St. Thomas wrote of the spherical earth as one who accepted it as true and took it for granted.  This would be even clearer in the Latin because in that language the verb of contrafactual clauses is written in subjunctive rather than indicative mood.   I have not even heard of a scholar who suggests that St. Thomas did not believe in the globe earth.  There is nothing dishonest about me understanding a passage in the way that many (probably most) other people understand it.

    As for the quotes, ultimately it does not matter whether or not they all show support for flat earth as you think.  What we need to be looking for in quotes from the Fathers regarding flat earth is the author's indication that he is writing about a matter faith.  If not, it is merely his personal opinion about natural science and not binding on us at all.  Can you produce quotes that say this is a matter of faith?
    It seems pretty clear that St. Augustine taught that these kind of questions are not a matter of faith:
    Now now, its one thing to write about a globe and quite another to teach about a globe.  Please provide any Catholic Father teaching on the globe.  Come to think of it, I'd be interested in seeing writings by those who are even mentioning the globe in passing.  Of the ones I know about only help my case, so in the interest of truth, do provide them.

    Offline Jaynek

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 4161
    • Reputation: +2305/-1228
    • Gender: Female
    Re: Did Catholics before the "Reformation" believe in FE?
    « Reply #205 on: December 01, 2017, 08:38:15 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Even theologians in tradition don't have a clear idea whether these encyclicals are binding. The reason being the erroneous encyclicals of modern popes. Sedes claim of course, that this is because they are not real popes.

    Are you a sede Jaynek?
    One of the encyclicals teaching us how to understand Scripture and the Fathers was written by Pope Leo XIII.  If we were to reject his teaching, why would we even be trads?  For many (most?) of us, his condemnations of modernism are a key factor in recognizing the crisis in the Church.  I can't imagine that anyone, sede or otherwise, would accept his teaching on modernism while rejecting his teaching on Scripture.

    But there would be a disturbing lack of docility in a Catholic who would reject an encyclical because it does not allow him to interpret Scripture as he wishes.  This is the attitude that led to the rise of Protestantism.


    Offline Jaynek

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 4161
    • Reputation: +2305/-1228
    • Gender: Female
    Re: Did Catholics before the "Reformation" believe in FE?
    « Reply #206 on: December 01, 2017, 08:40:40 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • There's no need to pretend, no need to guess, anything held  by the Church for over a thousand years "always, everywhere, and by all," is doctrine.  Don't take my word for it, go look it up.
    Look it up where?  In the book you cited which is notorious among historians for completely fabricating information.

    Offline Jaynek

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 4161
    • Reputation: +2305/-1228
    • Gender: Female
    Re: Did Catholics before the "Reformation" believe in FE?
    « Reply #207 on: December 01, 2017, 08:46:37 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Now now, its one thing to write about a globe and quite another to teach about a globe.  Please provide any Catholic Father teaching on the globe.  Come to think of it, I'd be interested in seeing writings by those who are even mentioning the globe in passing.  Of the ones I know about only help my case, so in the interest of truth, do provide them.
    Why are you still asking for quotes from the Fathers?  Haven't you understood a word that I have written?  The Church teaches that what they have written on this subject is their personal opinions and not binding on Catholics.  Every Father could have written that the earth is flat and it would not be a Catholic teaching that we are obliged to accept.  

    Offline happenby

    • Sr. Member
    • ****
    • Posts: 2768
    • Reputation: +1077/-1637
    • Gender: Female
    Re: Did Catholics before the "Reformation" believe in FE?
    « Reply #208 on: December 01, 2017, 08:49:54 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • I was not suggesting that St. Augustine believed the earth is a ball.  It seems to me that the quote is saying that questions about the shape and form of physical objects are not a matter of faith and that it can even be harmful to the faith to talk about it too much.

    My husband will not spank me if I were to start believing the earth is flat.  He would probably, however, no longer allow me to read trad forums.  Much more importantly, he would lose all respect for trads and our views on anything and probably stop attending the TLM with me.  I fail to see how the shape of the earth is more important than my husband's salvation.  It is part of my duty as a wife to do all in my power to aid his salvation.  I am under no obligation at all to have an opinion on the shape of the earth.  There is nothing courageous about what you suggest.
    You said: "He would probably, however, no longer allow me to read trad forums.  Much more importantly, he would lose all respect for trads and our views on anything and probably stop attending the TLM with me."
    So we have the smoking gun.  The reason you cannot be reasonable about flat earth.  Fear.  Fear of reprisal, fear of alienation, fear of people's opinions (beyond your husband's).  The fact is, you are afraid of being called stupid.  Yet that is exactly what you did to us in the beginning of this thread.  Yep, its all there in black and white.  Hopefully, there will be two lessons learned, fear not, cast not stones.  Oh, yea and a third one: earth is not a globe.     

    Offline happenby

    • Sr. Member
    • ****
    • Posts: 2768
    • Reputation: +1077/-1637
    • Gender: Female
    Re: Did Catholics before the "Reformation" believe in FE?
    « Reply #209 on: December 01, 2017, 08:55:23 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Look it up where?  In the book you cited which is notorious among historians for completely fabricating information.
    You're the one without basic Catholic information.  Ask your trad priest, make a phone call to the bishop, it doesn't matter, but please refrain from smarmy attacks on me that work against you.  In the meantime, anything held by the entire Church for a 1000 years or more, is fixed truth, doctrine, and unchangeable.