Can anyone point to a map that is the definitive flat-earth map recognized by all or most Flat-Earthers?

There isn’t one, because no FE map or model can be reconciled with reality nor with common *observable* and *demonstrable* facts such as measurable distances and movements of the Sun and Moon. Yes, they can *seemingly* make a case for FE, but in truth it has more holes than a piece of Swiss cheese.

100% False.  If there isn't a complete one, it's only because no one among FE has had the resources to produce one.  Herve Riboni, who had participated in sailing races around the world, has gone out there into the field to demonstrate that what we see in the typical maps has bene completely rigged, and he also demonstrates how they use "magnetic declination" to fake things in the Southern "Hemisphere".  He's actually working on a map right now.

As for "maps", what's the definitive Globe map, eh?  Why is it that there are 100 different "projections" in existence?  They had used the "Mercator" for decades, but it's actually completely wrong vis-a-vis the Southern Hemisphere.  They then came up with Gall-Peters, which purports to show the ACTUAL sizes of the continents, which is completely diffrent from Mercator.  Then others have claimed Gall-Peters is incorrect also.  FEs have then gone to look at the Google Earth Globe model and found tons of problems and discrepancies with it, including lacunae in the data that line up precisely with what you'd need to do in order to patch flatness onto a ball, and in fact the globe model was constructed by weaving together many linear passes of satellites.

So the simple fact is that we do not have a reliable and consistent map of the Globe.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_map_projections

Now, where it becomes even more interesting is that the North Pol Azimuthal Equidistant Projection Map ... a real map projection that represents the FE model, arguably reflects reality rather than being merely a distorted projection, and the greatest evidence for that is this ...

Simply go online to an Azimuthal Equipdistant map generation tool.  If you look at the North Pole Azimuthal Equidistant map, you can recognize quite clearly the shapes of the continents, with the one thing being that the Souther "Hemisphere" continents appear to be larger than you'd expect.  Well ... except that they are a very close match to the Gall-Peters projection map, which asserts that it accurately reflects the true size of those Southern "Hemisphere" continents, which had been artificially shrunk by the Mercator projection (due to the emphasis on Northern Hemisphere).  I've showed these on other threads.

Now, by contrast, have a look at a South Pole Azimuthal Equidistant Projection.  So, you have a real problem here.  Most of the Northern Hemisphere is absolutely distorted, to to the point of being unrecognizable, and that's to be expected on an Azimuthal Equidistant.  But then why is the North Pole Equidistant showing the Southern "Hemisphere" continents in almost the same shape and configuration we see on the Gall-Peters, and the same shape but slightly larger than Mercator?  At the very least, the Souther part of Africa and South America would be much "fatter", so that those continents would look almost square ...

UNLESS ...

the North Pole Azimuthal Equidistant Map reflects reality rather than being a "projection".

Hereunder a picture of the Earth - either global or flat - that proposes the landmass before the FLOOD

Jerusalem centre of the Earth’s original landmass.

So, this is based on that Pangea theory.  What do you supposed caused the breakup?  I mean, most likely the Flood, but how did that work, and by what mechanisms?  I've read things calling that theory into question, where the fact that South America fitting into Africa is not accurate, but due to something else that happend, but can't recall the details.

The emblem of the United Nations is a Flat Earth Map.

Fernand Crombette wrote about this:

"if what the Bible says is true, Jerusalem is at the centre of the world. He made up his mind to look into the matter. During his researches he discovered that Father P. Placet, a monk in 1668, had written a work entitled “The proof that before the Flood, there were no islands and that America was not separated from the rest of the world”.
Knowing also of Wegener’s thesis on continental drift, he returns to the libraries (and towards the end of his studies, during the war 1939-1945, at the University of Grenoble) to find geological and bathymetric charts in an attempt to reconstitute the primitive single known to geographers as the PANGEA.
Crombette’s inspired idea led him to look below the present contours of the continents, which vary according to the sea level, to the extreme edge of the continental shelf at a depth of 2.000 metres, where the sea bed falls away in a sharp drop into the ocean depths of 4.000 metres. Sixty years later, sub-marine drilling have confirmed that the continental granite shelf, beneath the marine sediments, is, in fact, found at this point. The motivation for his research at such a depth was Bible-based because he took the cosmogenic thesis of Kant, according to which the “waters on high”, separated by God at Creation, formed a water vapour ring around the earth which produced the forty days of great rain during the Flood.




https://www.jesusmariasite.org/crombette-if-the-world-only-knew/

.

It is a globe. No flat map can accurately portray the surface of a sphere. The various projections necessarily distort the surface of the earth in various ways. That's why there are multiple flat versions of the map; they all distort the shape of the land masses in various ways, and it's just a matter of which type of distortion someone is okay with.

But a system that claims the earth is flat should be able to produce a flat map of the earth that is perfectly accurate, i.e. that portrays correctly the size and shape of all land, and accurately portrays all the distances between all known locations in a manner that accurately matches observable measurements of distance when people travel from those locations to other locations. For example, if someone sails from one location to another and measures the distance he sails, that is the measured distance between those two points. A map that is accurate will portray the distance between those two locations as being the same as the distance measured by the sailor. Or, if someone claims the sailor did not measure the distance correctly or did not take the shortest route, it would be that person's burden of proof to sail between those two points and measure the distance himself, and then to produce a map that would accurately reflect what he measured.

Thank you. I’ve answered his objections multiple times in the past and I prefer not to do it again. It is completely pointless to try to convince people who are unwilling to accept logical conclusions from irrefutable and demonstrable observations and evidence.

I've never seen an FE map that corresponds with people travelling by jet from Perth, Western Australia to Buenos Aires, Argentina.

The jets fly over Antarctica on one side of the magnetic pole, and comes back on the other side. The compass interaction is a separate subject.

But passengers can look at their analog watches and find their trip takes 14 hours, whereas any FE map shows it would take about 3 times as long as that.

The real life trip corresponds clearly with the globe model.