CathInfo.com

This I found interesting, a FlatEarther that challenges some of the more common FE models
A FLAT EARTHERS HONEST OPINION ABOUT THE AZIMUTHAL EQUIDISTANT, FLAT EARTH MODEL. - TRUTH EVIDENCE

[color=var(--color_brand)]https://www.bitchute.com/video/kwXGOOGiWECf/[/color]

I offer as proof the video posted in the Original Post.
Beyond that, I offer Ladislaus' commentary on the video -- it's a pretty clear cut case.

Everything he said rang true, in terms of logic, and in terms of the facts.

Just the fact that Sungenis undertook this "hit job" and/or feels the need to curry favor (with whom?) by bashing Flat Earth in the first place shows his LACK OF OBJECTIVITY and/or BAD WILL in the matter. Therefore, he's a grifter, plain and simple. He's out for relevance, fame, money, whatever. Typical grifter.

I'm not criticizing each of those who still believes the Globe Earth lie. I'm criticizing a specific man who has been intellectually dishonest (to say the least) for the sake of aggrandizing his own position and reputation.

It's one thing to disagree with someone on an unclear or disputed topic. It's another thing to be found distorting, lying, using logical fallacies despite being high intellect, taking bribes, slandering your opponents, etc. for the sake of "being right" or aggrandizing your status.

As Ladislaus pointed out, he's not just arguing the case for a globe earth, a position I happen to disagree with. No, Sungenis has done many things worthy of actual BLAME.

Re-read Ladislaus posts, and stop being so emotional and attached to the damned NASA "globe" deception. Free your mind, and embrace the truth.

I won't copy/paste ALL Ladislaus' posts on the matter, but here is just ONE hard-hitting, irrefutable sample that frankly speaks for itself. It IS proof.

He admits going in that he set out to "debunk" Flat Earth ... having been commissioned (aka paid) by Kolbe Institute to do precisely that.

So Dr. Sungenis' intellectual dishonesty is palpable throughout the book.  It causes him to make repeated blunders in interpreting the Church Fathers, and the "science" sections were equally contrary to sound logic ... except the one section that I have not fully been able to analyze due to lack fo time, on account of the fact that it would involve a lot of research regarding alignments of the stars, etc.  Other FEs have done the research, but I have not been able to confirm or deny the contested findings in that regard.

I found it sad that Dr. Sungenis backed up NASA almost categorically, when NASA has been mocking and ridiculing his own geocentrism from the beginning.

I was deeply disappointed in his FEFW book ... and I cannot be more charitable about it than to say it was a large pile of trash.