Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: Debunk of a Flat Earth without using science but only empirical observations  (Read 22757 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Ladislaus

  • Supporter
Here's the video of an FE who interviewed a renowed astrophysicist ... and she does not perform well.

https://www.bitchute.com/video/Ndw0b6G7wWRe/

I'm not sure how I feel about interviews like this, obtained under false pretenses and intended to humiliate the person, but it does show how very little thought any of the "experts" have ever given to the issues raised by FE.

Offline Ladislaus

  • Supporter
Flat Earthism is based on two assertions that are physically impossible: 1) that the sun moves parallel to the ground in a straight line, and 2) that the sun moves in a path that is circular and parallel to the surface of the earth. There is no exemplar of either of these two types of movement anywhere in the universe; therefore they are both impossible.

As others have pointed out, this begs the question regarding what scientists claim about the rest of the universe.  Most of us think that the entire construct is a lie, that there are these solar systems with the sun in the center and planets revolving around them, etc.


Offline Ladislaus

  • Supporter
Here's the video of an FE who interviewed a renowed astrophysicist ... and she does not perform well.

https://www.bitchute.com/video/Ndw0b6G7wWRe/

I'm not sure how I feel about interviews like this, obtained under false pretenses and intended to humiliate the person, but it does show how very little thought any of the "experts" have ever given to the issues raised by FE.

This FE does make some very interesting points.  So he addresses the claim (about the 13:00 minute mark) that the reason we don't feel the rotation of the earth is because it has a constant velocity, but then he points out that we're allegedly revolving around the sun at the same time, and, therefore, as a result we should be experiencing regular changes in velocity, depending upon whether we're rotating AWAY from that orbit at 1000MPH or rotating TOWARD it.

Offline Matthew

  • Mod
I'm not sure how I feel about interviews like this, obtained under false pretenses and intended to humiliate the person, but it does show how very little thought any of the "experts" have ever given to the issues raised by FE.

If it wakes people up, great. I don't have a problem with what Project Veritas does, for example. How else do you infiltrate and expose? You can't walk up to them and say, "I'm a pro-lifer. You know, your enemy. Please give me a tour of your abortion facility." 

Offline Ladislaus

  • Supporter
If it wakes people up, great. I don't have a problem with what Project Veritas does, for example. How else do you infiltrate and expose? You can't walk up to them and say, "I'm a pro-lifer. You know, your enemy. Please give me a tour of your abortion facility."

Oh, Project Veritas is absolutely justified in doing what it does.  In this case, though, I don't think this woman is evil, just a dummy, and I kind of feel for her being embarrased like that.