Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: Debunk of a Flat Earth without using science but only empirical observations  (Read 4439 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Dankward

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 435
  • Reputation: +237/-264
  • Gender: Male
  • Deo confidimus!

Offline Romulus

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 490
  • Reputation: +281/-53
  • Gender: Male
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • So do all who live to see such times but it is not for them to decide, all you have to decide is what to do with the time that is given to you.


    Offline Dankward

    • Jr. Member
    • **
    • Posts: 435
    • Reputation: +237/-264
    • Gender: Male
    • Deo confidimus!
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!2
  • Another one:



    :popcorn:

    Online Ladislaus

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 32377
    • Reputation: +19214/-5066
    • Gender: Male
  • Thanks!3
  • No Thanks!2
  • Can you just admit that you’re simply unwilling to look at all the evidence objectively?  You just cherry-pick the things that you think favor your position without entertaining alternative explanations.  True objectivity requires a scholastic type of examination of all sides of an issue ... which you’ll never do.

    Offline Matthew

    • Mod
    • *****
    • Posts: 29142
    • Reputation: +24935/-413
    • Gender: Male
  • Thanks!2
  • No Thanks!0
  • I could do the same thing for Flat Earth, including declaration of "victory" with a touchdown dance and everything.

    And I would be more justified in doing so.
    Want to say "thank you"? 
    You can send me a gift from my Amazon wishlist!
    https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

    Paypal donations: matthew@chantcd.com


    Offline Dankward

    • Jr. Member
    • **
    • Posts: 435
    • Reputation: +237/-264
    • Gender: Male
    • Deo confidimus!
  • Thanks!2
  • No Thanks!4
  • There is no solid evidence for a flat earth.

    Except for observations like "this lake looks flat to me", but:

    "Where the senses fail us, reason must step in."

    It's literally a bunch of bloggers, youtube armchair experts and conspiracy theorists vs. the rest of the (educated) world.

    You can't refute the overwhelming evidence at all. This is not about "declaring victory" or anything, but about simply debunking an archaic and unscientific worldview, or should we say, conspiracy theory.

    Offline Cera

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 4282
    • Reputation: +1760/-962
    • Gender: Female
    • Pray for the consecration of Russia to Mary's I H
  • Thanks!3
  • No Thanks!4


  • Anyone who has done a cursory search about FE will be laughing at the stupidity of the OP.
    Pray for the consecration of Russia to the Immaculate Heart of Mary

    Offline Cera

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 4282
    • Reputation: +1760/-962
    • Gender: Female
    • Pray for the consecration of Russia to Mary's I H
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!1

  • Anyone who has done a cursory search about FE will be laughing at the stupidity of the OP.
    It was too late to modify or withdraw my post. I was going by the information showing the sun's path on the FE model which was once easily available. I wondered why the OP wasn't balanced. Had he not see the FE videos and diagrams?

    No he had not because they are being systematically disappeared.

    I now realize that a diagram like this one
    https://www.theflatearthsociety.org/forum/index.php?topic=43439.0
    is difficult to find.

    Page after page after page of searches for "sun's path on flat earth model" shows only attack after attack on FE theory and support for the Kabbalsitc, Freemasonic GE theory.

    Hmmm. Might this be an indication that the fake staged "alien" (demomic) invasion is coming soon. Those of us who believe God's word will not be easily manipulated as the rest of the population when our "space brothers" arrive and tell us that they, and not God, created life on earth.



     
    Pray for the consecration of Russia to the Immaculate Heart of Mary


    Offline Donachie

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 1288
    • Reputation: +365/-153
    • Gender: Male
  • Thanks!1
  • No Thanks!0
  • If it is an existential question, the flat Earth comes out funny, since space is 3-D, which is also spherical. The informative video mentioned "spherical radiation", as in "spherically radiating sunlight", which is true, there is that, and that's something something, and this type of radiation says a lot about the nature of space, even as pure or absolute space.

    If in principle all numbers themselves are as three dimensional as pure space, then the Earth would be odd or unnatural to be flat, since it is a number too. Numbers are three dimensional in all space, and in abstraction too, in the sense that there is always more or less in the relation ... the relation of position ... or any opposition.

    Since position is relative to six cosmic directions in one, for seven in the middle, the relation of more or less in all things is complete in 3-D; and the best relation of pure space to the infinite is in 3-D also. So if the Earth is flat, it is a strange tension for it to have in the great circles of 3-D space, where so many other things are round and full.

    Online Ladislaus

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 32377
    • Reputation: +19214/-5066
    • Gender: Male
  • Thanks!2
  • No Thanks!1
  • There is no solid evidence for a flat earth.

    Except for observations like "this lake looks flat to me", but:

    "Where the senses fail us, reason must step in."

    It's literally a bunch of bloggers, youtube armchair experts and conspiracy theorists vs. the rest of the (educated) world.

    More lies and dishonesty.  You deliberately present it backwards.  FEs don’t say “it looks flat to me”.  They do experiments, collect the data, do the math, etc.  You (and many brainwashed globetards)  show one picture with no data that appears to show something cut off on the bottom and declare victory ... without ever so much as considering other possible explanations for it.

    As for the “rest of the educated world”, don’t make me laugh.  FEs have done man-on-the-street interviews asking people how they would prove that the earth is a globe without using NASA.  Vast majority were stumped, and a couple used the lame boat disappearing over the horizon nonsense.

    When I get home, I will post an interview conducted stealthily be an FE of a world-renowned physicist that makes her look like an absolute illiterate idiot.

    I’ve known my share of Ph.D.s and the majority are dumber than a box of rocks.

    Offline Yeti

    • Sr. Member
    • ****
    • Posts: 2040
    • Reputation: +1085/-326
    • Gender: Male
  • Thanks!2
  • No Thanks!1
  • Flat Earthism is based on two assertions that are physically impossible: 1) that the sun moves parallel to the ground in a straight line, and 2) that the sun moves in a path that is circular and parallel to the surface of the earth. There is no exemplar of either of these two types of movement anywhere in the universe; therefore they are both impossible.


    Offline Pax Vobis

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 8621
    • Reputation: +5196/-1631
    • Gender: Male
  • Thanks!2
  • No Thanks!1
  • Nah, neither of those explain FE.  You’re attacking ghost facts.  The sun can move up and down, and side to side.  In the northern hemisphere winter, the sun is simply “down south”, that’s why it appears lower in the sky (because it’s farther away).

    Offline josefamenendez

    • Sr. Member
    • ****
    • Posts: 3219
    • Reputation: +2020/-144
    • Gender: Female
  • Thanks!3
  • No Thanks!0
  • Flat Earthism is based on two assertions that are physically impossible: 1) that the sun moves parallel to the ground in a straight line, and 2) that the sun moves in a path that is circular and parallel to the surface of the earth. There is no exemplar of either of these two types of movement anywhere in the universe; therefore they are both impossible.
    What universe?

    Offline roscoe

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 7519
    • Reputation: +576/-401
    • Gender: Male
  • Thanks!2
  • No Thanks!2
  • In case anyone hasn't heard, Columbus( who btw was Catholic) & Isabella determined 500 yrs ago that E is Globe( sphere) They are both of mucho higher authority than anyone in this forum... :fryingpan:
    There Is No Such Thing As 'Sede Vacantism'...
    nor is there such thing as a 'Feeneyite' or 'Feeneyism'

    Offline Yeti

    • Sr. Member
    • ****
    • Posts: 2040
    • Reputation: +1085/-326
    • Gender: Male
  • Thanks!1
  • No Thanks!0
  • What universe?
    I don't understand your question. :confused: