I've never really looked into this but is the moon also flat?  And the planets too?  Thanks.  Succinct answers get more points.

I don't think the moon is flat flat, but has optical illusion properties that make it hard to tell if its convex or concave (like the lighted singing busts on the Haunted Mansion ride at Disneyland) The visible part of the moon may be convex (rounded outwardly) which gives it a spherical appearance, or the surface may be actually be concave. This allows for an outer layer to interact with the aether to create a shadow for phases.  Because the moon rolls like a wheel, almost 180 degrees every night, and we only see one side, yet we see > 50%, also lends itself to to it being more of a disk with a concave or convex surface.  

Interesting.  When you've observed, did you mount the P900 onto a telescope and what size lens on the telescope?  Also, if the rings of Saturn are visible, why is Mars so distorted?  Seems like Mars should be a lot clearer given its distance.

Also, for a flat earth newbie such as myself, what's on the other side or bottom of the earth?  Thanks

How wide is the earth as a disk?

So, as I touched on before, Dr. Sungenis cited the Father Arnobius for holding that the earth is a sphere:

round, and bounded on every side by the circuмference of a solid sphere

But what does that mean, "round and bounded by a sphere"?  That makes no sense for NASA's ball earth.

Arnobius is clearly talking about a model of the earth that looks like this (that's backed up by multiple Church Fathers).



So, a cross-section of a sphere is what's "round and bounded on every side by a sphere.  This above here is what the Church Fathers meant when they called the earth a sphere, not that it's a ball on whose surface we live.  There's no doubt about it.  Another quote from Sungenis was from St. Ambrose, who's disputing against some who claim that the heavens can't spin around the earth because the waters (of heaven) would then flow down off the top of the sphere.  St. Ambrose disagrees, but they both agree that there's a sphere that keeps the waters out.  How does the idea of waters flowing down off the sphere make any sense for NASA's ball earth?  It doesn't.  Waters flowing down off the sphere in the ball model would have the surface of the earth (what NASA holds to be the sphere) inundated with water without a firmamet to keep it off there.

Some Fathers argued that the earth (as above) was a hemisphere because they believed that the heavier elements (earth for instance) would sink to the bottom of the universe (due to density).  St. Augustine felt that was a tenable opinion, since even if at the bottom, the earth could be said to be the center (as in center bottom).  Still others rejected it being a sphere of any kind because Sacred Scripture referred to the firmament being like a tent (which aren't typically round).  But St. Augustine uses the example of a ball where the material could be stretched and yet shaped like a sphere (or hemi-sphere).

I don't have a superzoom camera, but if I did I would love to not only check out boats that are supposedly too far away to be seen, but also get a photo like this if I could:

Yeah, like this.  Only the people on board the plane wouldn't feel a thing??





You can feel the plane tilt left, tilt right, tilt aft, but...


you never, ever, feel it tilt forward.


Otherwise, the people would start to scream and the Captain would have to say, 

"We're going over the curve, folks. Hang on tight!"  LOL



Oh, before anyone says it's sooo gradual, keep in mind that ships are supposedly disappearing behind that "curve" only 5 or 6 miles out.

10 miles out is a 66 foot DROP.