And do you really believe that the universe is 92 billion light years in diameter. I don't, not for one second. Scientists can barely get anything right, much less something that difficult. They've just been exposed apparently by Webb in terms of their contention that the universe is expanding. Red Shift has been exposed as a fraud (though this has been suppressed), and their gravitational theories about the universe have been completely debunked ... to the point that they had to invent dark matter. Another debunking has been their notion that the sun is some fusion furnace. There's convincing evidence that is is NOT. So even the basic things things about our closest star they get wrong, and they then use these assumption about "our star" to pretend they can then draw inferences about other stars. But all these other things were wrong.
I don't believe anything these people tell me.
In answer to your question, I neither believe nor disbelieve the universe is some 92 billion light years in diameter. I was merely referring to what I perceived to be a "consensus among most mainstream astrophysicists." My full statement was, "I could be a slightly off on my measurements, but from what I can see there appears to be somewhat of a consensus among most mainstream astrophysicists that the diameter of the known/observable universe is some 92 billion light years, i.e., 10 raised to the positive 26 meter." What I do believe, however, is something Sungenis & Bennett have explained very well in their masterpiece work
Galileo was Wrong: The Church was Right -- that the laws of science would not be in opposition to the entire universe spinning around the Earth not simply once in a 24 hour period, but a million, billion or trillion times in a 24 hour period!
(As a sort of aside -- the seemingly most incredible paradox of the ether is how it is seemingly incalculably super dense while all the while being seemingly incalculably super fluid. The density allows it to easilyl carry the heavenly material bodies of the universe while the fluidity allows them to move about ever so freely. And here's an interesting "tid-bit": if Planck size is the smallest material size possible it would easily answer that old riddle of why no one can win a race in so much as no one could cross the finish line because in order to cross the remaining length to the finish line they would always have to finish the first half and once they did that there would always be another divisible distance to cross ad infinitum. The science behind Planck length simply holds that once the runner got to within the Planck length of the finish line he would no longer have to worry about traveling the first half of that Planck length because there would be no first half and second half to it, just the one length itself.)
Now as for NASA, I'd be the first to admit that it is a extremely corrupt/evil entity, primarily due to its immense never ending vomit of lies upon lies, not to mention it being a financial black hole for nefarious undisclosed "projects." That said, we all know that even a broken clock is correct twice a day. Likewise, even a liar is capable of telling the truth from time to time, sometimes intentionally -- for example, if he thinks it will actually bring about a desired evil of one sort or another. He might also speak the truth inadvertently and in extreme cases such as a being subject to a successful exorcism the demon may even be forced, God willing, to tell a truth.
There is apparently a lot of scrambling going on at NASA in trying to debunk and of obfuscate an absolutely gigantic "truth cat" that their James Webb Space Telescope has let out of the bag. Perhaps, there was no practical way that they could cover up the evidence now coming out from the JWST photography or perhaps the powers that be in their presumed arrogance simply believed they could control the narrative regardless of whether the photography would of itself provide a very strong case for blowing the infamous Big Bang nonsense right back to the bowels of hell where it emanated from. Needless to say, it will be interesting to see how all this sorts out. Ha, it almost seems as though God were trying to give so many of these atheistic scientists one last chance to come clean by abandoning their evolutionary Big Bang pretensions.