

Yes, the notion of a pressurized atmosphere without a container and adjacent to a nearly-perfect vaccuм is to me a smoking gun that the NASA model is a lie. There's simply no explanation for it whatsoever. I've seen some lame attempts, but none of them come close to credibly explaining the phenomenon.
Now, if you look at the lightbulb above, that's an extremely weak vacuum. I've seen demonstrations where a stronger vacuum inside of a steel railroad tanker car caused the it to get crushed as if it were a cheap beer can. And the vaccuм of space (measured in torr) is orders of magnitude "stronger" than anything we've been able to reproduce here on earth. And we're to believe that those pathetic astronaut suits could withstand that? ... though it's a separate issue.