Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: Cosmo Hegelianism (not FE-related)  (Read 3164 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Anne Evergreen

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 702
  • Reputation: +295/-727
  • Gender: Female
Re: Cosmo Hegelianism (not FE-related)
« Reply #15 on: December 27, 2021, 02:17:18 PM »
  • Thanks!1
  • No Thanks!1
  • Well, seeing as how the annihilation of the entire human race is at stake we can either be like:












    Or we can be like:




    I know it's Christmastide and there are more joyful threads to visit.

    The Church reminds us that the Christ Child was not born into a world of lasting peace and joy, however.

    Today is the Feast of Stephen which is a reminder of the price each of us may be called to pay in the near future. 

    We need to be very clear why we may be called to follow in St Stephen's footsteps or we might cave and be very sorry to find ourselves still alive but slaves to a system the likes the world has never seen.

    St Stephen's Day is followed quickly by the Feast of the Holy Innocents with the Holy Babe in the cross hairs of a genocide.

    Thank goodness St Joseph was well informed of the enemies plans and didn't ignore the signs.  He had the courage to face the dangers and devise an escape for his family!

    May the Holy Angels guide us as well!

    May the peace of the Christ Child reign in our hearts despite the war raging all around us!
    Oh my goodness, another DUH. :facepalm: You are preaching to the choir.

    You sound like a lady trying to convert a Jehovah's Witness or something. All you need to do is trade places with the Jehovah on the street corner and her pamphlets. Yikes. You fit right in to my point; too many people OVER-ANALYZE stuff, and I am finding a lot of that here. There is a lot of narrow-mindedness and one-track thinking. But if a person is so caught up in it, they will NOT see it! They are in too deep. They look for negative stuff to happen, and so it will. 

    I have figured out (without even looking at too many avatars), that I would bet the great majority of people actually posting on the forums have been here a lonnnng time--5 or 10 years or more. I would also bet it is their only social outlet for many, and the prime outlet for many others. Which is fine, because Trads are spread all over, etc. I am not knocking that in itself. 

    But if you have ever figured out how groups behave, they all go through certain dynamics and adopt certain roles and hierarchies. It is very clear that this forum has a pecking order and group-think and group dynamics and that there are certain people in certain sub-groups. Make of that what you will.

    And if you go looking for martyrdom, well, I am sorry to tell you that you will be disappointed. VERY few people are called to that route. We aren't supposed to actually seek it out either.

    Have a nice day, Anne.

    Offline Anne Evergreen

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 702
    • Reputation: +295/-727
    • Gender: Female
    Re: Cosmo Hegelianism (not FE-related)
    « Reply #16 on: December 27, 2021, 02:31:37 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!1


  • You are the one stirring the pot by saying:
    Quote from: Anne Evergreen on Yesterday at 11:09:31 PM
    Lady, I came onto a guy's thread trying to learn about the Cosmos and stars and things. I was trying to understand and learn something from him, because I found some of his other points of view interesting. He seems highly intelligent.

    Astronomy? That's why I clicked on his thread. I enjoy watching stars. I thought there might be some connection, but I am guessing they are in another realm. Anyway, go back to your mending or washing or whatever you want. You have a bee in your bonnet for other reasons, and it is quite obvious you are taking your wrath out on people not connected to your chapel problems. I tried to help you at first, but gave up. 

    And yeah, many of the topics here are obscure, and that is why I am losing interest. Why is that any skin off your nose? 


    Offline DigitalLogos

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 8304
    • Reputation: +4718/-754
    • Gender: Male
    • Slave to the Sacred Heart
      • Twitter
    Re: Cosmo Hegelianism (not FE-related)
    « Reply #17 on: December 27, 2021, 05:34:22 PM »
  • Thanks!2
  • No Thanks!0
  • This thread :facepalm:

    "Be not therefore solicitous for tomorrow; for the morrow will be solicitous for itself. Sufficient for the day is the evil thereof." [Matt. 6:34]

    "In all thy works remember thy last end, and thou shalt never sin." [Ecclus. 7:40]

    "A holy man continueth in wisdom as the sun: but a fool is changed as the moon." [Ecclus. 27:12]

    Offline Cera

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 6648
    • Reputation: +3045/-1587
    • Gender: Female
    • Pray for the consecration of Russia to Mary's I H
    Re: Cosmo Hegelianism (not FE-related)
    « Reply #18 on: December 28, 2021, 06:39:03 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!1
  • Pray for the consecration of Russia to the Immaculate Heart of Mary

    Offline Meg

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 6791
    • Reputation: +3468/-2999
    • Gender: Female
    Re: Cosmo Hegelianism (not FE-related)
    « Reply #19 on: December 29, 2021, 10:47:48 AM »
  • Thanks!1
  • No Thanks!1
  • I've been listening to this guy's videos lately, and he has some pretty interesting critiques of modern cosmology. I don't know what flavor of Christian he is, probably not trad Catholic given some of the language he uses, but the points he makes are good.

    Language warning.


    I watched about half of the video. Some very good points are made. He may be right about the kabbalistic connection with NASA and the new cosmological worldview. I had assumed previously that NASA and the rest of the new cosmologists were pagan or atheistic. I'll have to reconsider. 

    He sounds Catholic, but it's difficult to tell. Some Catholics do use bad language. There are worse things.
    "It is licit to resist a Sovereign Pontiff who is trying to destroy the Church. I say it is licit to resist him in not following his orders and in preventing the execution of his will. It is not licit to Judge him, to punish him, or to depose him, for these are acts proper to a superior."

    ~St. Robert Bellarmine
    De Romano Pontifice, Lib.II, c.29


    Offline DigitalLogos

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 8304
    • Reputation: +4718/-754
    • Gender: Male
    • Slave to the Sacred Heart
      • Twitter
    Re: Cosmo Hegelianism (not FE-related)
    « Reply #20 on: December 29, 2021, 04:04:00 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • I watched about half of the video. Some very good points are made. He may be right about the kabbalistic connection with NASA and the new cosmological worldview. I had assumed previously that NASA and the rest of the new cosmologists were pagan or atheistic. I'll have to reconsider.

    He sounds Catholic, but it's difficult to tell. Some Catholics do use bad language. There are worse things.
    It's definitely worth looking into NASA if you'd like. Jack Parsons is the man you'll want to investigate first, as he was heavily involved in the occult and worked closely with Aleister Crowley and L. Ron Hubbard. He conducted rocket experiments for the US Government in a program that preceded NASA, as well as weird occult experiments in an effort to create a "homunculus" with the aid of Aleister Crowley. Parsons even believed himself to be the Antichrist and was raised up to be such by the Theosophists and OTO.

    I honestly don't know where Jimbob stands in the broad range of "Churchianity". I know he's been on Jay Dyer's channel a few times, so maybe EO, but the one discussion I watched didn't touch on his personal beliefs. And as for the language, I catch myself doing it at times too, I just make sure to place a warning as not to scandalize anyone.

    If you can tolerate Jay (I actually don't mind him when he talks on things other than theology), this podcast actually does a good job laying out the connections of Crowley, Parsons and NASA.

    "Be not therefore solicitous for tomorrow; for the morrow will be solicitous for itself. Sufficient for the day is the evil thereof." [Matt. 6:34]

    "In all thy works remember thy last end, and thou shalt never sin." [Ecclus. 7:40]

    "A holy man continueth in wisdom as the sun: but a fool is changed as the moon." [Ecclus. 27:12]

    Offline DigitalLogos

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 8304
    • Reputation: +4718/-754
    • Gender: Male
    • Slave to the Sacred Heart
      • Twitter
    Re: Cosmo Hegelianism (not FE-related)
    « Reply #21 on: January 06, 2022, 06:44:27 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Wrong thread
    "Be not therefore solicitous for tomorrow; for the morrow will be solicitous for itself. Sufficient for the day is the evil thereof." [Matt. 6:34]

    "In all thy works remember thy last end, and thou shalt never sin." [Ecclus. 7:40]

    "A holy man continueth in wisdom as the sun: but a fool is changed as the moon." [Ecclus. 27:12]

    Online cassini

    • Sr. Member
    • ****
    • Posts: 3922
    • Reputation: +3102/-275
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Cosmo Hegelianism (not FE-related)
    « Reply #22 on: January 08, 2022, 02:16:41 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Lady, I came onto a guy's thread trying to learn about the Cosmos and stars and things. I was trying to understand and learn something from him, because I found some of his other points of view interesting. He seems highly intelligent.

    Astronomy? That's why I clicked on his thread. I enjoy watching stars. I thought there might be some connection, but I am guessing they are in another realm. Anyway, go back to your mending or washing or whatever you want. You have a bee in your bonnet for other reasons, and it is quite obvious you are taking your wrath out on people not connected to your chapel problems. I tried to help you at first, but gave up.

    And yeah, many of the topics here are obscure, and that is why I am losing interest. Why is that any skin off your nose?

    Here is something worthy of debate Anne;

    ‘The story which the Zodiac unfolds in the course of the year lies in the meanings of these names given by God to each of the star-clusters [‘Praise the lord: He tells the number of the stars; he calls each by name' (Psalms 146)] in its forty-eight constellations when He set them in order in the beginning, making of them, as the Psalmist says: “faithful witnesses in heaven” (Ps. 88:38) of His plan for the world… Put in proper order, beginning not with Aries as now deployed, [Aries, Taurus, Gemini, Cancer, Leo, Virgo, Libra, Scorpio, Sagittarius, Capricorn, Aquarius, and Pisces] but with Virgo and ending with Leo rather than with Pisces, the Zodiac foretold in the stars the story of the Incarnation, the Redemption and the world to come long before the Bible was written. Virgo is of course the Blessed Virgin and Leo is the Lord Jesus Christ, the Lion of Judah, universal Lord of Creation. (This incidentally, provides the answer to the mystery of the Sphinx which, having the head of a woman and the body and tail of a lion is therefore simply a representation in stone of the ancient Zodiac).’---Solange Hertz: The Sixth Trumpet, Remnant Press, Minnesota, 2002, p.11.