There's no defense for the globe after Google Earth exposes the lie.
https://m.youtube.com/watch?feature=youtu.be&v=PAhOXQIZ4OE
.
The OP video presumes from the start that the GoogleEarth data points are all in reference to a flat plane.
But in fact, they're not.
The GoogleEarth data points are simply in reference to the geoid -- the existence of which flat-earthers deny.
Therein lies the rub.
.
That is to say, the OP pretends to make a presentation using a system, the basis of which the OP denies.
.
Take the graphic representation of elevations from Denver to Cincinnati for example.
At 0:37 the author posts a graph showing the changing ground elevation from Denver on the left to Cincinnati on the right.
.
Oh, but wait!
If he were to stand in Cincinnati and the earth is "flat" then why can't he see Denver at the top of the hill he just drew?
You can put a little man there above Cincinnati looking left toward Denver, and he should be able to see the ground rise up.
That's what his diagram shows!
But that isn't what the video talks about.
No, the video ignores the obvious.
The ELEPHANT in the middle of the room is not to be discussed!
.
You don't even have to wait for Ohio.
You can have the little man standing at Indiana with the same elevation of
"764 feet." From Indianapolis, Indiana, you should be able to look west and see Denver, Colorado, according to the chart.
You should be able to see the Rocky mountains north and south of Denver from Indiana.
But you can't.
Why not?
.
Simple. It is due to the earth's curvature that Denver CO is not visible from Ohio, or from Indianapolis at half the distance.
.
Then at 1:40 he shows the earth's globe as viewed from the side, which clearly gives the reason you can't see Denver from Cincinnati or from Indianapolis, but the author completely ignores this fact.
.
He goes on to whine about how GoogleEarth is trying to deceive the world, etc., etc., ad nauseum.
.
Then he ignores the western half of the Great Divide, probably because it would show how silly his nonsense is.
.
He jumps topic at 2:30 to the Great Lakes, looking at "the body of Lake Michigan," at
"574 feet above sea level.""There's no change in elevation! There's no curve
!" Yes, there is a curve -- it's in the geoid which is the datum and basis for all the points observed!
.
He deliberately ignores the fact that the surface of the lake is given as elevations compared to the geoid.
The surface of any body of water in GoogleEarth has nothing to do with a flat plane.
They are all references to the
difference between the shown elevation and the elevation of the geoid at that place.
.
It is a map showing the results of thousands of subtraction equations.
Each point on the map is computed by subtracting the elevation from the geoid elevation for that point.
But you would never know that by watching this flat-earthism video.