Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: % Confidence in Earth's Shape  (Read 88374 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Tradman

  • Supporter
Re: % Confidence in Earth's Shape
« Reply #225 on: August 13, 2022, 05:45:24 PM »
It seems to me the Earth has uniform depth to everything on the surface. About 3963 mile radius to the center.

Besides depth, consider the convergence of it, since depth is a kind of convergence. In "Meteorology" Aristotle mentions three principal kinds of motion: from the center, to the center, around the center, that exist in the elements and their patterns. The weather is full of patterns of convergence and the Earth is like an element that formed through convergence and condensation out of these three basic elemental motions, and that's why it most naturally was created as a sphere.
It seems? How do they know it is 3963 miles to the center if they've only been able to dig 8 miles down?  

Offline Ladislaus

  • Supporter
Re: % Confidence in Earth's Shape
« Reply #226 on: August 13, 2022, 05:51:58 PM »
It seems to me the Earth has uniform depth to everything on the surface. About 3963 mile radius to the center.

But modern science claim that the earth does NOT have a uniform depth, but rather has a lager radius at the equator than it does at the poles.

From nasa.gov:
Quote
The Earth is almost, but not quite, a perfect sphere. Its equatorial radius is 6378 km, but its polar radius is 6357 km

There goes "perfection".


Re: % Confidence in Earth's Shape
« Reply #227 on: August 13, 2022, 05:54:56 PM »
It seems? How do they know it is 3963 miles to the center if they've only been able to dig 8 miles down? 
Math n stuff.

Re: % Confidence in Earth's Shape
« Reply #228 on: August 13, 2022, 07:32:39 PM »
But modern science claim that the earth does NOT have a uniform depth, but rather has a lager radius at the equator than it does at the poles.

(It seems? How do they know it is 3963 miles to the center if they've only been able to dig 8 miles down?)  

From nasa.gov:
There goes "perfection".
They say that it's an "oblate spheroid" due to lateral forces from the so-called force(s) of gravity around the Earth and its surface, etc. This how they try to say that it has squeezed-in polar caps and an equatorial bulge, but it is false. There aren't lateral forces from "gravity" around the surface of the Earth and the Earth is not moving to orbit the Sun. It is a perfect sphere.

Elcano completed Magellan's circuмnavigation of the globe back in 1522, 22 years before Copernicus published his erroneous book. Drake circuмnavigated it later. Others have circuмnavigated it too, so gradually they were able to figure its dimensions with greater accuracy, also as a sphere, having circuмference and radius. to be very general, as there are six cosmic directions in space, if you say six times radius you get circuмference. If you divide circuмference by six you get radius.

Before that they were able to figure the Moon is something about 60 Earth radii away, so there goes the number 6 once more which is essential in the universal relation of space.

Re: % Confidence in Earth's Shape
« Reply #229 on: August 13, 2022, 08:00:47 PM »
Besides stage wires on the Moon, the "Moon rocks" ʝʊdɛօ-Masonic controlled NASA gave the Dutch turned out to be petrified wood.



As they used to say in the old Roman Law, "falsus ad lunam, falsus porro ad PLuto ... falsus". And people who don't know which way the Moon goes, sure aren't landing on it.