Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: Blue Origin GH2 Vent Cam / True Lens Correction /  (Read 5279 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline AnthonyPadua

  • Supporter
  • ****
  • Posts: 2390
  • Reputation: +1233/-245
  • Gender: Male
Blue Origin GH2 Vent Cam / True Lens Correction /
« on: November 19, 2023, 12:52:12 AM »
  • Thanks!1
  • No Thanks!0


  • Short video of the end result

    "noDonK Records" used his genuine expertise to make a TRUE LENS CORRECTION of the Blue Origin Video and he proves it.  This one video is truly a coup de grĂ¢ce of the globe and all of the lying propagandists.  62.4 miles (allegedly) and flat.  Open your eyes to our flat earth reality! 





    Lens correction full video with details




    original video for reference

    Offline Ladislaus

    • Supporter
    • *****
    • Posts: 46841
    • Reputation: +27718/-5146
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Blue Origin GH2 Vent Cam / True Lens Correction /
    « Reply #1 on: November 19, 2023, 07:02:40 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Yes, I saw that one.  No curvature and no drop in the horizon level.  I wonder if they'll trot out Neil de Grasse Tyson to claim "that stuff is flat" at 380,000 feet.


    Offline Ladislaus

    • Supporter
    • *****
    • Posts: 46841
    • Reputation: +27718/-5146
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Blue Origin GH2 Vent Cam / True Lens Correction /
    « Reply #2 on: November 19, 2023, 07:13:38 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • This horizon simulator shows 380,000 feet at about 28 seconds in.


    screenshot:

    Offline Matthew

    • Mod
    • *****
    • Posts: 32905
    • Reputation: +29182/-596
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Blue Origin GH2 Vent Cam / True Lens Correction /
    « Reply #3 on: November 19, 2023, 08:11:44 AM »
  • Thanks!1
  • No Thanks!0
  • And just a public service announcement --
    Yes, fisheye lense distortion is DEFINITELY a thing. I'm not just throwing that out there because I was born into Flat Earth and brainwashed with Flat Earth propaganda for decades. Quite the contrary. I was literally brainwashed with Globe propaganda for 4 decades. I busted out of it.

    You ALWAYS have to ask yourself: is it the "curve of the earth"? Or a FAKE curve? And no, it's not some convenient device to dismiss evidence I don't like, some confirmation bias, or some such.

    Because you CAN figure out, with logic, if the curve is real or not.

    ALWAYS COMPLETE THE CURVE. How big of an earth results? And what would be seen on this extrapolated "globe earth"? Would it be big enough to contain the continents we KNOW exist?

    Look at these pictures. Does a globe containing approximately 1 U.S. state seem reasonable to you? Sure doesn't to me.
    The world has several continents -- not just the state of Arizona.
    Want to say "thank you"? 
    You can send me a gift from my Amazon wishlist!
    https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

    My accounts (Paypal, Venmo) have been (((shut down))) PM me for how to donate and keep the forum going.

    Offline Matthew

    • Mod
    • *****
    • Posts: 32905
    • Reputation: +29182/-596
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Blue Origin GH2 Vent Cam / True Lens Correction /
    « Reply #4 on: November 19, 2023, 08:19:03 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • In other words, just seeing a curve and immediately saying in a deep, slurred voice "Duaahhhh yeah....dat's da curve!" is a smoothbrain idiot move. It's like they WANT there to be an earth curve or something, so they grasp at anything.

    At least falling for NASA's Blue Marble CGI globe/curve results in a world large enough for all the continents to exist.
    Want to say "thank you"? 
    You can send me a gift from my Amazon wishlist!
    https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

    My accounts (Paypal, Venmo) have been (((shut down))) PM me for how to donate and keep the forum going.


    Offline Ladislaus

    • Supporter
    • *****
    • Posts: 46841
    • Reputation: +27718/-5146
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Blue Origin GH2 Vent Cam / True Lens Correction /
    « Reply #5 on: November 19, 2023, 09:40:56 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • And no, it's not some convenient device to dismiss evidence I don't like, some confirmation bias, or some such.

    Even Neil de Grasse Tyson admitted the use of fish-eye / wide-angle lens during the Redbull jump.

    35 - 50 seconds, he speaks about the wide-angle lens:


    Now, he's actually wrong.  At 128,000 feet or so, you absolutely should be able to see some curvature and a drop in the horizon line.  See the simulator above.  So why did he say this?  It's because amateur groups are now able to send balloons up to about 120,000 feet and some of them used regular lenses that showed no curvature.  So this is an indirect way to "debunk" that footage.  Here we have it at over 3 times that altitude (allegedly), at about 380,000 feet ... and still no curvature once the lens correction is applied.  This individual's analysis is convincing.  He bases the correction on the horizon curve that was seen at ground level.

    Offline AnthonyPadua

    • Supporter
    • ****
    • Posts: 2390
    • Reputation: +1233/-245
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Blue Origin GH2 Vent Cam / True Lens Correction /
    « Reply #6 on: November 19, 2023, 05:21:09 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • And just a public service announcement --
    Yes, fisheye lense distortion is DEFINITELY a thing. I'm not just throwing that out there because I was born into Flat Earth and brainwashed with Flat Earth propaganda for decades. Quite the contrary. I was literally brainwashed with Globe propaganda for 4 decades. I busted out of it.

    You ALWAYS have to ask yourself: is it the "curve of the earth"? Or a FAKE curve? And no, it's not some convenient device to dismiss evidence I don't like, some confirmation bias, or some such.

    Because you CAN figure out, with logic, if the curve is real or not.

    ALWAYS COMPLETE THE CURVE. How big of an earth results? And what would be seen on this extrapolated "globe earth"? Would it be big enough to contain the continents we KNOW exist?

    Look at these pictures. Does a globe containing approximately 1 U.S. state seem reasonable to you? Sure doesn't to me.
    The world has several continents -- not just the state of Arizona.
    The op video points out that this particular case was not a fish eye lens but a different type of camera. Their tricks are certainly wide...