Author Topic: Catholic flat-earthism probably blasphemous or worse (Read 7442 times)

happenby · « **Reply #75 on:** June 27, 2018, 02:29:28 PM »

Quote from: Neil Obstat on June 27, 2018, 02:10:18 AM

Glober believe:
.
Pictures from space?
.
"Why would NASA lie? I'm sure at least one picture must be real."
.
The Sun, Moon and stars behave in observable, predictable ways that are contradictory to the globe model?
.
1."No problem, I still think earth is a globe".
.
Or: 2."Who am I to judge?"
.
Or: 3."NASA and other space agencies are reliable, and we can take their word for the shape of earth. See number 2."
.
GPS?
.
"32,000 huge football sized contraptions travel in orbits over earth, and although they are no pictures of them from space in large numbers, they are still out there...somewhere."
.
Gravity?
.
"All we have to do is throw a mic on the floor and that proves gravity exists".
.
Antarctica?
.
"Who cares every major country signed, and agrees to, a treaty regarding exploration of Antarctica. Nothing happening there."
.
Video of astronauts aboard the space station?
.
"We definitely went to the moon! And even if we didn't, and if NASA lied in a big way, they can't be lying all the time."
.
Ships over the horizon?
.
"They go behind the curve. And even if they don't go behind it, they do. Because sea level means water curves."
.
Foucault Pendulum in a museum demonstrating Earth's rotation?
.
"Let's look at a hypnotizing instrument go back and forth or round and round, and pretend that means earth is moving."

Neil Obstat · « **Reply #76 on:** June 27, 2018, 04:44:52 PM »

.

Apparently one picture goes a long way.

.

How about another picture?

.

Neil Obstat · « **Reply #77 on:** August 07, 2018, 11:21:54 PM »

.
The effeminate atheist, Eric Dubay, has deleted the most challenging comments under his videos.
In that way he can perpetrate the deception that there isn't much opposition to his false precepts and mundane canards.
Check out the comments under the following video:
.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EiBJBVBez_w&feature=youtu.be
.
In which he mispronounces Michelson-Morley and Tycho Brahe all in one minute (9).
Dubay is not only an effeminate atheist, he's an ignorant effeminate atheist.
.
Here is a forum member on another site explaining how his posts were all deleted once Dubay found his arguments too difficult:
.
.
David Sherby
Apr 20 (2018 ) · 10 upvotes including Pádraic Breathnach
I tried to watch that video. As a comedy routine it was almost decent but unfortunately it wasn’t supposed to be a comedy!
-- I started posting counter arguments to his "200 proofs" and in a short while all my comments were removed and Eric permanently blocked my comments on all of his videos.
I can see my comments while logged in to my You Tube account, but when not logged in they are invisible! Can you say fraud?

Pádraic Breathnach
Pádraic Breathnach
Apr 20 · 6 upvotes including David Sherby
Ha - I thought there were very few negative comments - dissent would spoil his hoax.
.
.
As I have already shown, flat-earthers are quite vulnerable to hoaxes such as this, they fall for them quite eagerly!

happenby · « **Reply #78 on:** August 08, 2018, 10:09:21 AM »

Catholic church architecture reflects the universe and the flat earth. Eric Dubay has a fraction of the truth as anyone outside the Church may. Makes one wonder who is watching effeminate atheists?

Neil Obstat · « **Reply #79 on:** August 08, 2018, 01:33:33 PM »

Quote from: happenby on August 08, 2018, 10:09:21 AM

Catholic church architecture reflects the universe and the flat earth. Eric Dubay has a fraction of the truth as anyone outside the Church may. Makes one wonder who is watching effeminate atheists?

.
There is nothing "flat" about Catholic Church architecture.
It is very 3-dimensional, the best examples of which rise to the skies.
Eric Dubay is an atheist ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖ liar and miscreant who deliberately deceives anyone within earshot.
Every time you quote his nonsense you support his malignant heresies.

happenby · « **Reply #80 on:** August 08, 2018, 01:43:48 PM »

Quote from: Neil Obstat on August 08, 2018, 01:33:33 PM

.
There is nothing "flat" about Catholic Church architecture.
It is very 3-dimensional, the best examples of which rise to the skies.
Eric Dubay is an atheist ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖ liar and miscreant who deliberately deceives anyone within earshot.
Every time you quote his nonsense you support his malignant heresies.

Lol. So because flat earthers use the term "flat" you think we are saying earth is only two dimensional? Oh that's rich. Now I've heard it all.
Eric Dubay has no idea the earth is the macrocosm of cathedrals and churches, so why bring him up? He doesn't listen to the Church Fathers any more than you.

Neil Obstat · « **Reply #81 on:** August 08, 2018, 01:51:27 PM »

Quote from: happenby on August 08, 2018, 01:43:48 PM

Lol. So because flat earthers use the term "flat" you think we are saying earth is only two dimensional? Oh that's rich. Now I've heard it all.
Eric Dubay has no idea the earth is the macrocosm of cathedrals and churches, so why bring him up? He doesn't listen to the Church Fathers any more than you.

.
You are the one who keeps quoting Dubay.
You keep saying the horizon rises to the eye of the viewer, which is a Dubay falsehood.
You quote him and you love what he says so you must adore what he is, an atheist and a fag.

Neil Obstat · « **Reply #82 on:** August 23, 2018, 07:22:13 PM »

.
I ran into this 2-year old video that sheds new light on the Book of Enoch nonsense.
.
Sheila Zilinsky interviews a guest who provides the Protestant view, that the corrupt Catholic Church at the time of Constantine conspired with the devil to prohibit Catholics from reading the Book of Enoch because it tells the true story of where demons come from, and the devil doesn't want mankind to be apprised of the truth!
.
Now we know where happenby has been getting her false doctrine -- from Catholic-hating Protestants!
.

.
Only going to show how any Catholic subscribing to flat-earthism is probably blasphemous or worse.
.
In the video, Sheila says the links for the guest's website are given under video information, but to her credit, she must have had second thoughts and removed them because they're no longer showing on her channel page. I'm glad she left the video up, though, because it gives an interesting view of how hateful and misinformed Protestants can be. This guest sounds like a typical lemming who would swallow flat-earthism hook, line and sinker, since he regards the Book of Enoch as of greater value than the Bible, just as happenby does, even if she doesn't have the courage or honesty to admit it.

happenby · « **Reply #83 on:** August 23, 2018, 11:04:21 PM »

Figures the resident glober turns to satanic videos to support his garbage. Still no proof, no argument. <sigh>

Neil Obstat · « **Reply #84 on:** September 10, 2018, 01:57:06 AM »

Quote from: happenby on August 23, 2018, 11:04:21 PM

Figures the resident glober turns to satanic videos to support his garbage. Still no proof, no argument. <sigh>

.
Thank you for recognizing the fact that the "Book of Enoch" is nonsense.

Neil Obstat · « **Reply #85 on:** September 10, 2018, 02:43:09 AM »

.
What do you believe is the Catholic Church's teaching on demons, happenby?
Do you believe that a demon is a bad angel, entirely spirit without any body?
.

BALTIMORE CATECHISM #3
LESSON 4 - ON CREATION

.

Q. 214. Which are the chief creatures of God?
A. The chief creatures of God are angels and men.
...
Q. 216. What are angels?
A. Angels are pure spirits without a body, created to adore and enjoy God in heaven.
Q. 217. If Angels have no bodies, how could they appear?
A. Angels could appear by taking bodies to render themselves visible for a time; just as the Holy Ghost took the form of a dove and the devil took the form of a serpent.
Q. 218. Name some persons to whom Angels appeared.
A. Angels appeared to the Blessed Virgin and St. Joseph; also to Abraham, Lot, Jacob, Tobias and others.
Q. 219. Were the angels created for any other purpose?
A. The angels were also created to assist before the throne of God and to minister unto Him; they have often been sent as messengers from God to man; and are also appointed our guardians.
Q. 220. Are all the Angels equal in dignity?
A. All the Angels are not equal in dignity. There are nine choirs or classes mentioned in the Holy Scripture. The highest are called Seraphim and the lowest simply Angels. The Archangels are one class higher than ordinary Angels.
...
.
Q. 226. Were the angels, as God created them, good and happy?
A. The angels, as God created them, were good and happy.
Q. 227. Did all the angels remain good and happy?
A. All the angels did not remain good and happy; many of them sinned and were cast into hell, and these are called devils or bad angels.
Q. 228. Do we know the number of good and bad Angels?
A. We do not know the number of the good or bad Angels, but we know it is very great.
Q. 229. What was the devil's name before he fell, and why was he cast out of heaven?
A. Before he fell, Satan, or the devil, was called Lucifer, or light-bearer, a name which indicates great beauty. He was cast out of heaven because through pride he rebelled against God.
Q. 230. How do the bad Angels act toward us?
A. The bad Angels try by every means to lead us into sin. The efforts they make are called temptations of the devil.
Q. 231. Why does the devil tempt us?
A. The devil tempts us because he hates goodness, and does not wish us to enjoy the happiness which he himself has lost.
Q. 232. Can we by our own power overcome the temptations of the devil?
A. We cannot by our own power overcome the temptations of the devil, because the devil is wiser than we are; for, being an Angel, he is more intelligent, and he did not lose his intelligence by falling into sin any more than we do now. Therefore, to overcome his temptations we need the help of God.
...
.
Q. 249. Did Adam and Eve remain faithful to God?
A. Adam and Eve did not remain faithful to God, but broke His command by eating the forbidden fruit.
Q. 250. Who was the first to disobey God?
A. Eve was the first to disobey God, and she induced Adam to do likewise.
Q. 251. How was Eve tempted to sin?
A. Eve was tempted to sin by the devil, who came in the form of a serpent and persuaded her to break God's command.

Neil Obstat · « **Reply #86 on:** September 12, 2018, 02:29:14 AM »

.
More stunned silence from the resident flat-earthdom syndromer, happenby!

Neil Obstat · « **Reply #87 on:** September 15, 2018, 08:33:50 AM »

.
Three more days of stunned silence from happenby, who doesn't know what to believe is the Catholic doctrine about demons.

happenby · « **Reply #88 on:** September 19, 2018, 06:42:05 PM »

You do go on, Neil.

Neil Obstat · « **Reply #89 on:** September 22, 2018, 01:56:14 PM »

.
When flat-earthdom syndromers ever break the multiple-day silence, it's not to offer anything relevant, par for the course.
.
.
What do you believe is the Catholic Church's teaching on demons, happenby?
Do you believe that a demon is a bad angel, entirely spirit without any body?
.
.
Avoiding the question, as usual?

Author Topic: Catholic flat-earthism probably blasphemous or worse (Read 7442 times)

happenby

Re: Catholic flat-earthism probably blasphemous or worse

Neil Obstat

Re: Catholic flat-earthism probably blasphemous or worse

Neil Obstat

Re: Catholic flat-earthism probably blasphemous or worse

happenby

Re: Catholic flat-earthism probably blasphemous or worse

Neil Obstat

Re: Catholic flat-earthism probably blasphemous or worse

happenby

Re: Catholic flat-earthism probably blasphemous or worse

Neil Obstat

Re: Catholic flat-earthism probably blasphemous or worse

Neil Obstat

Re: Catholic flat-earthism probably blasphemous or worse

happenby

Re: Catholic flat-earthism probably blasphemous or worse

Neil Obstat

Re: Catholic flat-earthism probably blasphemous or worse

Neil Obstat

Re: Catholic flat-earthism probably blasphemous or worse

Neil Obstat

Re: Catholic flat-earthism probably blasphemous or worse

Neil Obstat

Re: Catholic flat-earthism probably blasphemous or worse

happenby

Re: Catholic flat-earthism probably blasphemous or worse

Neil Obstat

Re: Catholic flat-earthism probably blasphemous or worse