Observation without experiments/calculations is ridiculous.
The “see too far” experiments are testing SCIENTIFIC MEASUREMENTS as proposed by the big-science industry. Nobody is just randomly looking into a telescope and saying, “Hmm, this seems like too far of distance for me to see.” 
Your criticisms just show that you don’t even understand what the FE’ers are doing.
That's actually what I see the globers doing. "Look! part of the bottom of that boat is missing." No attempt whatsoever to let us know the data ... how far away is it, how much of it should be missing at that distance, what optics are you using, what the weather conditions are, i.e. whether there may be choppy waves responsible, or humidity if they say refraction is or is not involved. Meanwhile, the FEs do all that work every time. Dr. John D makes 90-minute videos because he so meticulously measures everything.
That's 100% confirmation bias where they see something and consider that "proof" without even attempting to analyze it.
Also quite interesting is that whenever something does NOT disappear when it should due to globe they just automatically claim "refraction" (without any proof but just due to assuming it can't be true), but then when something does disappear, say, the bottom of those windmills in the one picture, "aha! globe! proof!" ... but wait a minute, what about refraction? ... Could refraction have been responsible for what we see? No, refraction magically just appears out of nowhere when there's some indication of Flat but then just as magically disappears when there's any suggestion of globe. "Hey, wait. Why is that one blade of the windmill in the back 10x bigger than the blade of the windmill in the front. Should be smaller unless there's some atmospheric effect going on." -- "Shut up, FLERF! You moron you!"
You could cut the intellectual dishonesty there with a knife. It's downright pathetic really.
Topic: Balloon footage - it's flat (Read 20601 times)