Author Topic: Ball Earth Geocentrism is flat-lining  (Read 624 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Tradplorable

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 616
  • Reputation: +110/-464
  • Gender: Male
Ball Earth Geocentrism is flat-lining
« on: October 23, 2017, 11:15:43 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!2
  • It's dying...haha.
    .
    https://www.geocentrismdebunked.org/flat-earth-global-appeal-geocentrism-much/

    Quote
    A little more exploration shows that, not only is interest in Flat Earth outstripping geocentrism by a long mile, its appeal is geographically more diverse.  Ball earth geocentrism seems limited to the United States, while the Flat Earth phenomenon is more global in its appeal.
    .
    .Ironic.
    .

    I would have said, "Flat earth is WORLDWIDE in its appeal."
    .
    .

    Offline Neil Obstat

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 16192
    • Reputation: +7829/-526
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Ball Earth Geocentrism is flat-lining
    « Reply #1 on: October 23, 2017, 11:58:29 AM »
  • Thanks!1
  • No Thanks!0
  • .
    So in other words, flat-earthism is beginning to enjoy a global appeal. 
    .
    Now that is something to be proud of. Congratulations.
    .
    .--. .-.-.- ... .-.-.- ..-. --- .-. - .... . -.- .. -. --. -.. --- -- --..-- - .... . .--. --- .-- . .-. .- -. -.. -....- -....- .--- ..- ... - -.- .. -.. -.. .. -. --. .-.-.


    Offline Tradplorable

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 616
    • Reputation: +110/-464
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Ball Earth Geocentrism is flat-lining
    « Reply #2 on: October 23, 2017, 12:02:30 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!1

  • Offline DZ PLEASE

    • Sr. Member
    • ****
    • Posts: 2929
    • Reputation: +736/-774
    • Gender: Male
    • "Lord, have mercy."
    Re: Ball Earth Geocentrism is flat-lining
    « Reply #3 on: October 23, 2017, 01:55:20 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • "Lord, have mercy".

    Offline kiwiboy

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 511
    • Reputation: +197/-415
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Ball Earth Geocentrism is flat-lining
    « Reply #4 on: October 23, 2017, 03:01:30 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Very interesting.
    Eclipses neither prove nor disprove the flat earth.

    "As for whether or not I work for NASA, I'm sorry, but I fail to understand what that could possibly have to do with anything" Neil Obstat, 08-03-2017


    Offline Neil Obstat

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 16192
    • Reputation: +7829/-526
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Ball Earth Geocentrism is flat-lining
    « Reply #5 on: October 23, 2017, 03:39:27 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Very interesting.
    .
    Breaking News!

    Flat-Earthism Enjoys Global Appeal

    .
    .--. .-.-.- ... .-.-.- ..-. --- .-. - .... . -.- .. -. --. -.. --- -- --..-- - .... . .--. --- .-- . .-. .- -. -.. -....- -....- .--- ..- ... - -.- .. -.. -.. .. -. --. .-.-.

    Offline kiwiboy

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 511
    • Reputation: +197/-415
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Ball Earth Geocentrism is flat-lining
    « Reply #6 on: October 24, 2017, 04:23:42 AM »
  • Thanks!1
  • No Thanks!0
  • .
    Breaking News!

    Flat-Earthism Enjoys Global Appeal

    .


    Good thing you're not pedantic Neil...
    Eclipses neither prove nor disprove the flat earth.

    "As for whether or not I work for NASA, I'm sorry, but I fail to understand what that could possibly have to do with anything" Neil Obstat, 08-03-2017

    Offline Confiteor Deo

    • Newbie
    • *
    • Posts: 18
    • Reputation: +22/-1
    Re: Ball Earth Geocentrism is flat-lining
    « Reply #7 on: October 24, 2017, 07:11:50 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • I don't see how the geocentric model can make sense once you accept the concept of gravity as the glue holding the whole structure together. How could the entire universe rotate around a tiny earth?


    Offline DZ PLEASE

    • Sr. Member
    • ****
    • Posts: 2929
    • Reputation: +736/-774
    • Gender: Male
    • "Lord, have mercy."
    Re: Ball Earth Geocentrism is flat-lining
    « Reply #8 on: October 24, 2017, 07:43:39 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • I don't see how the geocentric model can make sense once you accept the concept of gravity as the glue holding the whole structure together. How could the entire universe rotate around a tiny earth?
    What could it orbit, do you suppose?
    "Lord, have mercy".

    Offline Confiteor Deo

    • Newbie
    • *
    • Posts: 18
    • Reputation: +22/-1
    Re: Ball Earth Geocentrism is flat-lining
    « Reply #9 on: October 24, 2017, 08:37:52 AM »
  • Thanks!1
  • No Thanks!0
  • What could it orbit, do you suppose?
    I'm sorry but I don't understand the question. A geocentric earth doesn't orbit anything

    Offline Tradplorable

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 616
    • Reputation: +110/-464
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Ball Earth Geocentrism is flat-lining
    « Reply #10 on: October 24, 2017, 10:38:02 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • I don't see how the geocentric model can make sense once you accept the concept of gravity as the glue holding the whole structure together. How could the entire universe rotate around a tiny earth?
    I really want to know how those stars and planets SUDDENLY DECIDED to start SPINNING to coalesce and MAKE THEMSELVES.
    .
    .
    That, to me, is the most idiotic part of heliocentric/ball-earth geocentrism.


    Offline Meg

    • Sr. Member
    • ****
    • Posts: 2412
    • Reputation: +1125/-1773
    • Gender: Female
    Re: Ball Earth Geocentrism is flat-lining
    « Reply #11 on: October 24, 2017, 10:59:49 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • I don't see how the geocentric model can make sense once you accept the concept of gravity as the glue holding the whole structure together. How could the entire universe rotate around a tiny earth?

    I don't know how gravity would fit into it, but I think you're right to ask how it is that the entire universe could rotate around a tiny earth. It doesn't make sense that the universe would rotate around the earth. 

    In a flat earth model, the universe isn't so huge, and it rotates above the earth, not around it. At least that's my understanding of the general view of how a flat earth and the universe works. 

    Offline DZ PLEASE

    • Sr. Member
    • ****
    • Posts: 2929
    • Reputation: +736/-774
    • Gender: Male
    • "Lord, have mercy."
    Re: Ball Earth Geocentrism is flat-lining
    « Reply #12 on: October 24, 2017, 01:50:21 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • I'm sorry but I don't understand the question. A geocentric earth doesn't orbit anything
    " How could the entire universe rotate around a tiny earth? How could the entire universe rotate around a tiny earth?"

    Entertaining the possibility that you're not just another screwdriver making with the guile. It was your question(?), yet you "don't understand" the response?
    "Lord, have mercy".

    Offline DZ PLEASE

    • Sr. Member
    • ****
    • Posts: 2929
    • Reputation: +736/-774
    • Gender: Male
    • "Lord, have mercy."
    Re: Ball Earth Geocentrism is flat-lining
    « Reply #13 on: October 24, 2017, 01:54:49 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • ... the universe... rotates above the earth, not around it. 
    But it's a dome no, wait, it's a "snowglobe", which is around but it doesn't orbit, it rotates, but only the top half? .... Jeruasalem? 

    But not "orbit" because NASA.
    "Lord, have mercy".

    Offline Confiteor Deo

    • Newbie
    • *
    • Posts: 18
    • Reputation: +22/-1
    Re: Ball Earth Geocentrism is flat-lining
    « Reply #14 on: October 24, 2017, 04:01:50 PM »
  • Thanks!1
  • No Thanks!0
  • I don't know how gravity would fit into it, but I think you're right to ask how it is that the entire universe could rotate around a tiny earth. It doesn't make sense that the universe would rotate around the earth.

    In a flat earth model, the universe isn't so huge, and it rotates above the earth, not around it. At least that's my understanding of the general view of how a flat earth and the universe works.
    Yes, you understood what I was saying. The choice either is a flat earth with the firmament, or the heliocentric universe we were brought up to believe in. As curvature cannot be detected, and there is no evidence that the earth moves, the flat earth model is most logical option.

    I don't see how the geocentric option can be considered. This model assumes the existence of gravity for every celestial object except for the earth.  It makes no sense.

    God Bless !

     

    Sitemap 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16