Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

« previous next »
Pages: 1 [2] 3

Author Topic: Bad news flat earthers  (Read 11107 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline cassini

Re: Bad news flat earthers
« Reply #5 on: November 07, 2025, 04:55:26 AM »
Quote from: Matthew on November 06, 2025, 03:13:07 PM
Retarded nonsense; not even "ha ha" funny


I agree Matthew, a load of 'satire' as it said at the bottom of the article.
I put it up to keep members informed of the bullsh.. going on out there.
Logged

Offline Matthew

  • Mod
Re: Bad news flat earthers
« Reply #6 on: November 07, 2025, 12:29:51 PM »
Quote from: cassini on November 07, 2025, 04:55:26 AM
I agree Matthew, a load of 'satire' as it said at the bottom of the article.
I put it up to keep members informed of the bullsh.. going on out there.


Yes, I fully understood right away it was supposed to be satire, or a form of humor.

But maybe it's because I don't find a mass deception of humanity to be "funny" -- but I don't find such material humorous at all. I have a great sense of humor (as anyone who knows me will attest).
But if you attempt to joke about murdering my kids, mass rape of German women after WW2, Jєωιѕн war crimes, leading millions of souls into Hell, etc. I'm not going to find it funny. Some things just aren't appropriate for humor.
Logged

Offline Mat183

Re: Bad news flat earthers
« Reply #7 on: November 08, 2025, 03:35:08 AM »
Quote from: Matthew on November 07, 2025, 12:29:51 PM
Yes, I fully understood right away it was supposed to be satire, or a form of humor.

But maybe it's because I don't find a mass deception of humanity to be "funny" -- but I don't find such material humorous at all. I have a great sense of humor (as anyone who knows me will attest).
But if you attempt to joke about murdering my kids, mass rape of German women after WW2, Jєωιѕн war crimes, leading millions of souls into Hell, etc. I'm not going to find it funny. Some things just aren't appropriate for humor.

Who could possibly disagree with such a statement?!  But, of course, this all just simply begs the question or perhaps stated another way assumes evidence as proof of something very much in question and contested (by people operating in good faith) either by interpretation of that same evidence and or by entirely different evidence.

Globe Earthers simply don't have to cower to Flat Earthers being offended by such a story no more than they have to cower at us being offended by some similar type of satire raised against us.  We don't believe them.  They don't believe us.  Why can't we just finally agree to disagree until and unless the Church in her wisdom makes some sort of definitive faith obliging declaration on the matter.
Logged

Offline Everlast22

  • Supporter
Re: Bad news flat earthers
« Reply #8 on: November 08, 2025, 07:27:43 AM »
I'll tell you what... 

The powers at be made damn sure even God's most faithful would still buy into modern science BS.

Logged

Offline St Giles

  • Supporter
Re: Bad news flat earthers
« Reply #9 on: November 08, 2025, 12:45:50 PM »
Quote from: Mat183 on November 08, 2025, 03:35:08 AM
  Why can't we just finally agree to disagree until and unless the Church in her wisdom makes some sort of definitive faith obliging declaration on the matter.
Because one side is pushing a lie, and on top of that, both sides seem to be very concerned about truth. If the truth is being pressed, fine. But both sides are being pressed, one by the world at large (which doesn't necessarily mean it's true), and one by the face of "the largest Traditional Catholic forum", which is a sort of support line for Traditional Catholics being tossed about by the chaos of modern events, who are on high alert looking for crazy people to avoid, and sanity to latch on to. I'm not convinced FE is a solid enough theory to publicly declare as a certainty or even just more likely than GE. I'd like to talk in person to a FE some day to try to understand how each of us can be so confident in opposing beliefs. I want to understand the logic behind it, and where the error in either or both parties lies.
Logged
Pages: 1 [2] 3
« previous next »