Yes, I would consider myself a fairly well-educated person, with not only a background in the humanities (Greek/Latin, philosophy/theology, etc.), but I also did very well in Math through Calculus, and have college credit in Physics, along with taking some advanced math classes in college. I also worked at NASA for about 4 years as a software engineer.
It took me a while to embrace geocentrism, mostly because I had never studied the issue much, but between 1) realizing the various issues related to cosmology from geocentrism and 2) realizing that our government lies to us more than they tell the truth (9/11, moon landings, ... nearly-infinite list) ... I was willing to at least "have a look". That's how I was eventually won over to geocentrism also, just because I was willing to have a look. Lest you think that I embrace every conspiracy theory, there are dozens I've seen here that I've pushed back against for being without foundation.
I was first exposed to FE on the FE sub-forum here through members of a group called Flat Earth Trads. I admit that I first considered their claims to be absurd, but had the intellectual honesty to also admit that I didn't know enough about their arguments to make a fair assessment. So I'd go in there and see what they had to say. I'll tell you right now that NOBODY wakes up one morning wanting to be a flat earther. I'm a very rational individual, who views the world in terms of syllogisms, to the point that my wife compares me to a Vulcan, but I found that the intellectual conclusions I started to make about FE were warring against a powerful reluctance based on this programmed disposition of "No, it can't be." Nor did I relish the ridicule that I know I would get by becoming an FE. So, after about 6 months of looking into the issue, I "came out" as "leaning Flat Earth", then 90% convinced, to the point where I'm 99.9% convinced that the earth is flat. I never say 100%, except about the Catholic Faith.
I think that part of the reason I was more open to it than some others here is because ... I don't trust NASA as far as I can throw a Saturn V rocket. They have a history of demonstrable lying and deception. I also know that the modern scientific establishment is driven by an atheistic agenda (from geology, to evolution, to everything) ... often by their own admission. Between these two, with their bias and dishonesty evident, I have to disregard any of their claims as completely unreliable and must rely on other evidence. I also realize that we've been deceived about so many things, from the World Wars, the Jєω/Bolshevik control of the world, to, more recently, the JFK assassination, USS Liberty, Vietnam (Gulf of Tonkin), Oklahoma City, 9/11, the "war on terror", the Plandemic and "safe and effective" jab, that I don't have a blind trust in the "authorities" upon whom we rely to know what our universe looks like. Then, finally, there's too much in Sacred Scripture that doesn't mesh with a globe earth, and we have myriad ancient cosmologies that are FE, in different civilizations around the world. I've long held that if ancient cultures scattered around the world all agree on something, there's probably a very reliable foundation in reality. We see that these cultures all believed in a Universal Flood as well, for example. I don't accept the Darwinian bias that the ancient human beings were morons with clubs, skins, and communicating in grunts and groans. These were brilliant people, and having been closer to the knowledge that Adam and Even had about the nature of the world, I find that their testimony cannot be discounted.