Yes Ladislaus, two different movements in Tycho's geocentrism can give two different year times by a few minutes as measured.
 But its the fixed helio sun and stars that cannot have two different year times.
So, does this prove heliocentrism is wrong.

People should question geocentric the globe model guy Tycho Brahe as a source, considering his practices.   

The pioneering astronomer Johannes Kepler may have had his eyes on the heavens, but chemical analysis of his manuscripts suggests he was “willing to get his hands dirty” and may have dabbled in alchemy. https://www.theguardian.com/books/2019/jun/13/groundbreaking-astronomer-kepler-may-have-practised-alchemy

And from Wiki,

Tycho Brahe
Danish astronomer and alchemist, 1546–1601
Tycho Brahe, generally called Tycho for short, was a Danish astronomer of the Renaissance, known for his comprehensive and unprecedentedly accurate astronomical observations. He was known during his lifetime as an astronomer, astrologer, and alchemist. He was the last major astronomer before the invention of the telescope. Wikipedia

alchemy /ăl′kə-mē/
noun

• A medieval chemical philosophy having as its asserted aims the transmutation of base metals into gold, the discovery of the panacea, and the preparation of the elixir of longevity.
• A seemingly magical power or process of transmuting.
• An imaginary art which aimed to transmute the baser metals into gold, to find the panacea, or universal remedy for diseases, etc. It led the way to modern chemistry.

The American Heritage® Dictionary of the English Language, 5th Edition

In 1601, at the age of 55 Tycho came down with a ‘mysterious’ disease, now thought to have been mercury poisoning resulting from his alchemy or perhaps metals used in his false nose. Before he died, and so that his work could carry on, he entrusted one of his students with his records, one Johannes Kepler.

‘Beginning in 1669, Newton devoted the next ten years of his life all but exclusively to alchemical research, including experiments involving equipment in his Cambridge apartment. Newton devoted more of his life to alchemy than he did to mechanics or optics or even mathematics. The Principia was in many ways the culmination of his alchemical studies, but it was also in many ways nothing but a short interruption of them as well.’--- E. Michael Jones

What we know now is that by the time of his death in 1727, Newton had amassed over one million written words on alchemy.  The Royal Society, who published all his other works, had prudently deemed Newton’s alchemical thoughts ‘not fit to be printed.’ But in 1936, the cat leapt out of the bag when a wealthy industrialist John Maynard Keynes purchased a case of Isaac Newton’s writings found hidden away. Expecting to find Newton’s scientific notes he found instead the man’s writings on alchemy. After reading these papers, Keynes coined a new identity for Isaac in 1942, ‘the last of the magicians.’

In 1696 an unnamed and shadowy figure…visited Newton in Cambridge to discuss alchemy. They did not meet by chance; the man came to find him. Newton recorded the conversation in a memorandum. Alchemy formed the initial subject of a correspondence with Robert Boyle (1627-1691) [Royal Society] that commenced in 1676. His friendship with John Locke [Royal Society] and Fatio de Duillier [Royal Society] involved alchemy, but both of them began only in the late 1680s.

And they are the freemasons who promoted heliocentrism a proven