The Catholic Church teaches that Scripture is inerrant.  Therefore, claiming that Scripture describes a flat earth necessarily implies that, according to the Church, the earth is flat.  Every time somebody says that Scripture teaches flat earth, it is, in effect, claiming this is Catholic teaching.

I think that it's perfectly fine to say something like, "It is my opinion that Scripture teaches flat earth."  Once could make that case.  But it's obvious that the Church, at very least, tolerates globe earth ... and leaves it open for Catholics to hold that opinion.

All scripture is Divinely Inspired or "God breathed."  So, I think we should respect that and if The Church has a problem with it, then I think it ought to get inline with Scripture.  Although, as a Catholic I will ultimately submit to The Church, still I have no problem with correcting The Church, if I think it is wrong about something.  As a Catholic, that is my right.

This is like saying that the Church is opposed to writing in Latin because she condemned the Copernican Doctrine which was written in Latin.

Obviously there is no problem with writing in Latin.  That is not the aspect of De revolutionibus orbium coelestium that was condemned. Virtually everybody wrote scholarly works in Latin at that time.  It is clearly irrelevant to the condemnation.

Similarly, virtually all the cosmological models at the time of Copernicus, including those promoted by the Church, included a spherical earth. The Church has no more problem with a spherical earth than with using the Latin language.  Both have been part of Church tradition for most of her history.

It certainly is possible for a given language to be inappropriate and worthy of condemnation and/or opposition.  I think most of us here object to Mass in the vernacular for such a reason.
  
But even if my analogy were ineligible, the point would stand: the condemnation of Copernican heliocentrism obviously does not include the proposition that the earth is a sphere; this was part of cosmological models of which the Church approved and promoted.

There is no basis for your claim that the Church condemns spherical earth.  On the contrary, this was the most widely accepted Catholic view for most of our history.

Spherical earth is not a "condemned theory".  Some Church Fathers disagreed with it while others agreed.  Nobody with authority to condemn it ever did so.

Many Catholic Saints (virtually all of the ones who lived after 800) believed in a spherical earth and this was the position encouraged by the Church and taught in Catholic universities for over a thousand years.  This is a Catholic view, never condemned or even discouraged by the Church.  

You have taken some quotes from the Fathers and your personal interpretation of Scripture to fabricate support for flat earth that never existed historically.  You are in opposition to the actual historical Catholic understanding that the earth is a sphere.  No matter how much you claim this is a pagan belief, it is a longstanding Catholic tradition.  Flat earth, on the other hand, is promoted in modern times by occult pagans like  Eric Dubay.

I am not defending "the science of pagans".  I am defending Catholic tradition and historical truth.   You may like to pretend that you are fighting pagans, but you are their ally.  You oppose the usual view of Catholics for most of our history.

As you say, the Church (at the very least) leaves open the option of believing the earth is a sphere.  This means that these people who think that Scripture teaches flat earth, in effect, are saying that the Church has been wrong to do this.  If inerrant, God-inspired Scripture truly said that the earth were flat, it would be wrong for the Church to allow other views.  How would it be OK for the Church to say "Go ahead and disagree with Scripture if you want"?