Please, refresh(?) subj: "Criteriology", esp. those who not only readily dismiss as a rule or habit secular authorities of field, without demonstrating warrant.
Crayola/fingerpaint version: we aren't entitled to find as incredible that or whomever we like when by Catholic and scholastic principles we must accept, at minimum, reflexively.
i.e., e.g., just because our grammar teacher publicly professes Satanism, does not of itself make them equivalent to a layman in their field.
No? s.a., e.g., Avicenna, Averroes, Maimonides, Al Gebr, Aristotle…
Then again, one supposes that rockets must not fly at all if an ALLEGED (by whom? Subtantiation pls?) Mason used his square for more than grip candy and Ba'al bling.