Is there some kind of "Flat Earth Aviators Association", is there an updated membership d-base, and can we access it, kind of like a sex offender registry? I ask because I could probably stand the walk, and don't mind groundtrans if there are such critters, worst case. By what principles do they operate? Can we get line of sight with advanced optics to the other edgeof the world? How come it doesn't shrink, or does it? What is the rate? How come i never got lost, could gague time to dusk, could do stellar nav? How do ballistics, esp. stratscale, REALLY work? How is it that there are depth/altitude differentials affecting time/distance in subs/aircraft if the Earth is flaT?

This is really thrilling news...

Wasnt using a magnet dude. Make up your mind/s. Is there a curve, or isn't there? All rhetorical, and sarcastic. I might hit your links right after the lunar limberger one. That you don't know what I'm talking about only shows those who do more conclusively that you don't. You think you help the faith, but all that you really do is pass ammo to infidels, as if they needed the help in calling us ignorant.


TLDR: Been there. Done that. Doesn't survive basic crit think,  let alone Criteriology. Not interested. Waste of time.

Even IF it were true, we're all headed for the grave. There are much greater concerns.

Evolution? Rubbish. No actual proof. Geocentrism? Even Einstein(?) basically said that it was a matter of coordinates, so sure.

Euclidean "Flat" Earth? Nope. Sry. Right up there with "Evolution"


Bye

Wasnt using a magnet dude. Make up your mind/s. Is there a curve, or isn't there? All rhetorical, and sarcastic. I might hit your links right after the lunar limberger one. That you don't know what I'm talking about only shows those who do more conclusively that you don't. You think you help the faith, but all that you really do is pass ammo to infidels, as if they needed the help in calling us ignorant.


TLDR: Been there. Done that. Doesn't survive basic crit think,  let alone Criteriology. Not interested. Waste of time.

Even IF it were true, we're all headed for the grave. There are much greater concerns.

Evolution? Rubbish. No actual proof. Geocentrism? Even Einstein(?) basically said that it was a matter of coordinates, so sure.

Euclidean "Flat" Earth? Nope. Sry. Right up there with "Evolution"


Bye

I hadn't realized that you are not a supporter of Heliocentrism. Sorry about that.

As to the other issue, the inability to show an accurate depiction of the supposed scale of the earth and moon in relation to the sun, well, this issue isn't the same thing at all as not being able to depict an oxygen molecule. We cannot, of course, see molecules at all with the naked eye. We can, however, clearly see the sun and moon.

It isn't reasonable, IMO, to think that the sun is so far away from the earth that it can't possibly be depicted accurately in a drawing of any kind whatsoever.

And we have Sacred Scripture on our side.

I wonder if one of the main reasons that some geocentrists insist that the earth is ball, is that all of the other observable planets are balls, and it would just be weird if the earth were flat, and not like all the others. And it IS a bit weird, to be sure, but then again, why shouldn't the earth be different than those other lifeless planets?

Why shouldn't our planet be different? That's what I would like to ask Neil next. Our planet has to support life, and a lot of it - from humans, to animals, birds, insects, plant life, etc.

As you said....the dome of the earth would have to be 93,000,000 miles away, in the system that Neil envisions and believes in, and that's not imaginable by any scale; it doesn't work. Though perhaps Neil (and Sungenis?) don't believe that there's such thing as a dome.

Perhaps geocentrist ball-earthers believe that Sacred Scripture is wrong - that Genesis is wrong, or that is has been wrongly interpreted. But of course we are allowed to interpret it literally. To say that it can be mortally sinful to believe in a flat earth defies logic and scripture.

I checked in to see if any flat-earthers have observed the full moon today so they can have an intelligent discussion for a change, based on the facts of what they can see in God's sky.
.
But no, not a single post on the full moon today.
.
The moon reached its full phase at 11:12 am today, UTC -7. That means Pacific Daylight time.
.
But at 11:12 am a full moon is not visible in the sky, as one can readily know by the relative position of sun, moon and earth --- unless, that is, you subscribe to the flat-earth model which appears to have both sun and moon equally visible at that time.
.
So, just as with the coming total solar eclipse, which flat-earthers cannot predict, explain or understand, so too the full moon happening in broad daylight is something they can't predict, explain or understand either.
.
So what CAN flat-earthers predict, explain or understand, if anythin