Author Topic: 50 Plus Reasons The Earth Is Not Flat (Read 340929 times)

TomGubbinsKimmage · « **Reply #355 on:** March 13, 2017, 06:36:26 AM »

Neil may be dazzling people with his posts, which display a diabolical obstinacy, but we should all recall that he is unable to account for hundreds of feet of the mountain in this video, as per an earlier thread. The truth always exposes liars. That's why I love it.

[youtube]https://www.youtube.com/embed/S4oT2EbDONs[/youtube]

He was asked the question numerous times, but still to this day has not answered it.

He just keeps coming back with other smaller issues, trying to confuse people.

By the way here is how the stars actually work

[youtube]https://www.youtube.com/embed/ahNfU7zYlmY[/youtube]

and here are the proofs of the flat earth for those who are only tuning in now.

http://flatearthtrads.forumga.net/f9-flat-earth-proofs

BumphreyHogart · « **Reply #356 on:** March 13, 2017, 07:03:06 AM »

Quote from: cassini

Quote from: BumphreyHogart
Quote from: happenby
The Church teaches infallibly that heliocentrism, the notion that earth moves and sun is stationary, IS FALSE and contrary to the Faith. The Church also teaches that the sun, moon and stars reside inside a visible firmament that is laid out as a firm boundary, like a tent, between heaven and earth.

The Church teaches no such thing. The Church has for generations taught heliocentrism in Her parish schools. This would not happen if it were against Catholic teaching.

We better not get into this discussion on this thread Bumphy, but you deserve an answer to your post.

The master of U-turn accusations just starts his post off with a U-turn! You should have started another thread.

happenby · « **Reply #357 on:** March 13, 2017, 11:41:55 AM »

Pythagoras was recognized by Johannes Kepler as “grandfather of all Copernicans.” 1
Galileo viewed the papal edict of 1616 as a “suppression of the Pythagorean opinion of the mobility of the earth”. 2
Heliocentrism is the science of the Pythagorean Doctrine or Copernican Doctrine and is the model promoted today.

The Jєωιѕн Encyclopedia states that the Kabbalah is the origin of the philosophy of Pythagoras. It was the secrets of the Kabbalah that led Pythagoras to heliocentric philosophy.

German humanist Johannes Reuchlin (1455-1522) says that Pythagorean philosophy emanated from the Jews, not the Greeks.

Martin Wagner conducted an objective and thorough study of Fɾҽҽmαsσɳɾყ and wrote a book about his findings titled “Fɾҽҽmαsσɳɾყ: An Interpretation” In the book it is found that the Kabbalah is unadulterated witchcraft and occultism.
The Zionist Kabbalah Jews hide behind Gentile Fɾҽҽmαsσɳɾყ and control the sciences through various arms of the government, including NASA.

Theological ‘pontiff’ for the Freemasonic religion and author of “Moral Dogma of the Ancient and Accepted Scottish Rite”, Albert Pike teaches: “The Masonic Religion should be, by all of us initiates of the high degrees, maintained in the purity of the Luciferian Doctrine.”
Albert Pike, Morals & Dogma, "Masonry is identical to the ancient Mysteries ", which means that all their teachings in all their books are precisely the same as the Ancient, Pagan, Satanic Mysteries.
NASA symbols and philosophy promote this same Freemasonic Luciferian
doctrine.

On the Space Administration's Web Page we read: "NASA's ORIGINS PROGRAM will search for clues to help us find our cosmic roots.“

Now that we have a little history of NASA, Pythagorean/Copernicans and their "Luciferian doctrine" it is quite clear that those who adopt the heliocentric theory hold anti-Catholic belief. The Church condemned this trash during the Galileo Affair.

happenby · « **Reply #358 on:** March 13, 2017, 12:04:37 PM »

Dr Seth Pancoast wrote that “Isaac Newton was led to the discovery of physical laws (forces of gravitation and repulsion) through the study of Kabbalah.”

<Isaac Newton> learned how to read Hebrew, scrolled through the Bible and delved into the study of Jєωιѕн philosophy, the mysticism of Kabbalah and the тαℓмυd — a compendium of Jєωιѕн oral law and stories about 1,500 years old.

http://www.timesofisrael.com/sir-isaacs-Jєωιѕн-writings-enter-the-21st-century/

He's considered to be one of the greatest scientists of all time. But Sir Isaac Newton was also an influential theologian who applied a scientific approach to the study of scripture, Hebrew and Jєωιѕн mysticism.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/culture/books/booknews/9085812/Israeli-library-uploads-Sir-Isaac-Newtons-theological-texts.html

I could go on and on, but I think this sufficient to show Newton was one of "them".

BumphreyHogart · « **Reply #359 on:** March 13, 2017, 12:32:06 PM »

Quote from: happenby

Now that we have a little history of NASA, Pythagorean/Copernicans and their "Luciferian doctrine" it is quite clear that those who adopt the heliocentric theory hold anti-Catholic belief. The Church condemned this trash during the Galileo Affair.

The Church' magisterium did not condemn it. The Church's disciplinary arm acted on a particular case to protect the faith of the faithful. You probably don't understand this because your own faith is screwed up (as shown in the Feeneyite sub-forum). The Church has, and always will, even condemn truth if it is worded improperly which is prone to mislead the common faithful.

The Holy Office protected the faithful because geocentrism was so closely connected with Holy Scripture and commonly so. At a time when Protestant revolt was disfiguring the faith, the Galileo affair was disturbing the faithful in a sudden wave, and the Holy Office successfully protected the faithful. It appears to be true that the Holy Office considered the danger to be intrinsicly doctrinal, which we know now was a mistake, but it WAS NOT a doctrinal mistake of the magisterium, and in the end it showed itself to be an extrinsic danger to the faith. Extrinsic dangers pass with the passing of time and circuмstance.