As an example of keeping some decorum alive in the discussion, this guy seems to show some promise. He's just getting started so he might have a lot more to offer in the future:
I think it's noteworthy that none of the Flat-earthers have a reply to the video I posted, above.
Some quick responses.
The main argument of the flat earth is the lack of curvature. Something you personally have avoided, especially when challenged by the male members of the forum.
It is not the phoney images of NASA. Even if we couldnt prove easily they were phoney, flat earth lack of curvature would still stand.
The thesis of the the earth is, "what we know of the earth is flat". That is a positive thesis, not one which just sets out to disprove the globe earth.
There are different types of manipulation. It depends on what you judge the motivation to be. Also, there are major things like the different sized north america, and the fact that experts now claim the earth is pear shaped, and yet the images don't reflect this. It is contradictions which are the most important.
It is not difficult to photograph the earth.
I agree that NASA faking everything does not necessarily imply a flat earth.
The round earth is big, but not that big. The maths shows us clearly that 120 miles across would make a different of at least 1.5 miles. Look it up, you're an engineer.
The best items for showing objects over the horizon, are viewed from sealevel.
Like the video you conveniently ignored back in the other thread? Remember, the missing few hundred metres you just ignored? Yea.
Just an aside, I find it amusing the way globalists like using the earth curve calculator, to try to show off how they are maths geniuses and we are jsut ignorant, but when you show them where they are wrong! Silence. You're not the only one Neil, if it is any consolation.
There is such a thing as circular reasoning. Some theories appear logical, but only within themselves. They are not truly logical, because they don't consider certain other factors.
The moon arguments by globalists are sometimes not properly studied, so
it can be easy to mock flatearthers.
His rhetoric about the flat earth being dangerous, is just wrong. This guy has not taken the time to study the curvature issue in depth.
At the end of the day, you like this guy mostly cos he has english accent don't you ?? go on admit it.