Ever since sailors have been navigating the Atlantic Ocean, they have relied on measurement of the angle from the horizon to the height of Polaris to tell them how far they are from the equator.
Even today, this measurement is a reliable gauge of the degrees north of the equator.
You have been unable to explain how that can be if there is no curvature from north to south, and it's really funny to watch flat-earthers turn head over heels trying to avoid the obvious. You're making a joke of your own blindness. :rolleyes:
Am I the only one to notice, that even when Neil gets answers to his questions, he just ignores them?
He posts questions, to try to sow doubt in the minds of outside observers.
He's not interested in admitting that he might be wrong.
There is an answer to his question above, but is it worth responding to a person who is not interested?
I am so quick to respond every time Neil Obstat posts in a flat earth thread because I am not allowing him to sow doubt in the minds of outside observers; that is our job. :wink: I also notice he sometimes tries to post in a flat earth thread when he thinks we are most likely to not be looking.
Are you "so quick to respond" this time?
How about a substantive answer for a change? See above.
[youtube]https://www.youtube.com/embed/qcgxBTrmIhU[/youtube]
Loved the video. I'm looking at other Dubay videos. You are making me think about this issue. I almost said "re-think" but that would not be accurate because this alternative theory, and its relationship to Zionist control of scientism -- (as opposed to actual science), is not something I have actually ever considered. Until now, the two alternative theories are not something I have actually thought about.
Along with everyone else, I have just bought into the pervasive view that globe theory is correct, the theory of gravity or correct, the earth spinning at 1000 mph is correct, our course around the sun at 5000 or so mph is correct, and our galaxy is also said to be spinning around.
Since I once was tricked into believing the lie about the scientistic (not scientific) theory about evolution (the phony chart showing ape, ape-men and man made me believe a lie) -- I know that it is easy for us to be tricked by the deception of a powerful enemy which controls the media, (what passes for) education, and the government.
I am realizing that just to go this far, to fairly compare two opposing theories is quite politically incorrect. To even give both theories a fair hearing is to risk public shaming. The public shaming of "flat-earthers" is much worse that the public shaming of those who research original sources of information rather that sucking up to abc/nbc/cbs/cspan/cnn and who are therefore called "conspiracy theorists." Both are labels with heavy negative baggage, designed to steer people away from even thinking about certain issues.
Topic: 50 Plus Reasons The Earth Is Not Flat (Read 340602 times)