Peterson has one of the original photographs on his FAQ page:
"an actual photo from the ISS, taken with a 15 mm lens on a Nikon D3S, for comparison"
"The photos were taken with a long exposure (about 1-3 seconds per photo, depending on the sequence)"
So here we have a non-enhanced original photo.
Clouds are snow as white although there is no light from above other than from the stars.
.
Where does Peterson say there was no moonlight?
Where do you get,
"there is no light from above other than from the stars?" Just making stuff up, eh?
You had better get some experience before you start passing judgment.
The clouds there are not
"snow as white" (
white as snow?). They are gray.
You should be able to see what white is by comparing it to your own computer screen, or hold a white sheet of paper next to it.
.
Can you read?
The photos were taken with 1-3 seconds [from one to three seconds exposure time] per photo.
Do you have any idea what that means?
.
Your American Airlines video did not use any 3-second exposures.
It didn't use any 1-second exposures.
It didn't even use any 1/50th second exposures.
Your fake AA video doesn't even bother to mention what the exposure setting was. Probably automatic.
Which means the exposure time was around 1/60th up to 1/250th second. Chances are, I've already lost you.
So how could it capture the gray clouds without having used extended time exposures?
Topic: 50 Plus Reasons The Earth Is Not Flat (Read 335524 times)