None of the flat earthers (excepting Pax Vobis) cared to comment on the posts about the flat earthers implicit claim that all the world, including Moses, Solomon, and the Lord, use deceptive language, describing appearances and not reality.
Pax Vobis answered "there is more than 1 FE theory", implying that the common flat earthers idea, that the sun doesn't move vertically above FE, must be rejected to avoid said alleged deceptiveness of our languages.
I'm not aware of any published alternative FE theory about the trajectory of the sun. And if there was one, it would contradict observation. The sun doesn't change size while it is observed over time within the tropics where it is seen at noon at the zenith.
Heliocentrism too, like FE, claims deceptive language, describing appearances and not reality. Heliocentrism too, like FE, claims that what we all see isn't true. FE proponents frequently insist that they believe what they see with their own eyes. But in fact, they claim that we can't trust our senses. All humanity called the sunrise sunrise and the sunset sunset, while FE proponents say: it appears as if the sun rises, but in reality it doesn't. Additionally, FE proponents claim that all humanity, including Moses, Solomon, and the Lord, are too retarded to intuitively handle perspective.
But who is really retarded?