Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: 3 Full Moons Last Month 2nd Full Moon Tonight  (Read 30301 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Ladislaus

  • Supporter
Re: 3 Full Moons Last Month 2nd Full Moon Tonight
« Reply #95 on: February 14, 2022, 06:53:12 PM »
Don't even need science to debunk the most basic assertions of flat earthers.

No, you globers are decidedly afraid of real science.  You’ve made it absolutely clear how you refuse to look at the subject objectively, as a question of science.  It’s actually rather pathetic to watch you and Marion carry on like a couple of crybabies who can’t let go of their teething rings.

Re: 3 Full Moons Last Month 2nd Full Moon Tonight
« Reply #96 on: February 14, 2022, 07:00:20 PM »
No, you globers are decidedly afraid of real science.  You’ve made it absolutely clear how you refuse to look at the subject objectively, as a question of science.  It’s actually rather pathetic to watch you and Marion carry on like a couple of crybabies who can’t let go of their teething rings.

Here, Pax Vobis, Ladislaus is one of those who presented "perspective" as the reason why it only seems as if the sun is rising and setting, while in reality it isn't. I'm curious to hear what he says about the Lord, saying that the sun is rising.


Online Pax Vobis

  • Supporter
Re: 3 Full Moons Last Month 2nd Full Moon Tonight
« Reply #97 on: February 14, 2022, 07:27:51 PM »
Marion, there's no contradiction.  "Sunrise" is just a common term to explain how it looks as the sun arises at the beginning of the day.  If you think it's some sort of scientific term, you're sadly mistaken.  Most people are not scientifically minded (nor do they need to be), so most terms originate from the common folk and their perspective.  

Re: 3 Full Moons Last Month 2nd Full Moon Tonight
« Reply #98 on: February 14, 2022, 08:10:36 PM »
Marion, there's no contradiction.  "Sunrise" is just a common term to explain how it looks as the sun arises at the beginning of the day.  If you think it's some sort of scientific term, you're sadly mistaken.  Most people are not scientifically minded (nor do they need to be), so most terms originate from the common folk and their perspective. 


Pax, I agree that rising of the sun and setting of the sun (or moon) are common terms used in all languages to describe general observations of all (including scientists). Now, flat earthers claim that these observations deceive. See e.g. the quote at the end of this post. Start the video at 11'45". The guy explains that the sun really moves at a constant height, while it only appears to rise or set.

Flat earthers claim that people were and are generally deceived, and were and are too retarded to realize the effects of "perspective". People have called the sunrise sunrise and the sunset sunset, ever since at least Moses. The Lord called it sunrise. Some decades after the NASA fooled the world with fake moon landings, the Lord gave grace to some, to the flat earthers, to see that humanity erred since at least Moses, who called the sun rising and setting, while in reality it isn't.

More precisly, humanity erred up to the Apostle Eric Dubay.



It's not before 2015, that the current FE sun and moon model was published.

Recent flat earthers claim that people generally are deceived and speak according to appearences and not according to reality. This, as presented, includes Scripture; Moses, Solomon, and the Lord.

An analog problem is known since Galileo Galilei, who thought that the earth orbits around the sun. St Robert wrote:

Quote from: St. Robert to Foscarini
And if you tell me that Solomon spoke only according to the appearances, and that it seems to us that the sun goes around when actually it is the earth which moves [...]

Consequently, our flat earthers put themselves into an uncomfortable situation. They claim that Moses, Solomon, and the Lord speak "only according to the appearances". Their situation is that of the heliocentrists.



This is some of the best sun timelapse stuff I've seen.





Lots of great footage, but see in particular 9:29 - 10:34.  If the sun is 93 million miles away, it should NOT increase in size like that.  It absolutely looks like it's coming closer to the camera.

12:15 - 13:12 ... watch it get smaller and move in a straight line as if in a perspective line.

P.S.: The video is nonsense. E.g. the guy presents perspective as if the sun wouldn't change size with distance. I can't understand how Ladislaus falls for such cretinism.

Online Pax Vobis

  • Supporter
Re: 3 Full Moons Last Month 2nd Full Moon Tonight
« Reply #99 on: February 14, 2022, 10:09:33 PM »
A sunrise doesn’t prove the sun moves around the earth each day.  There is more than 1 FE theory.  You’re obsessed with Dubay as if he’s the president of FE.  

How many theories of sedevacantism are there (100s)?  Not all the details are worked out (not even close). But still, millions of people believe it and it’s plausible even if not fully explained (yet).  Get the parallel?