With regard to the so-called "craters" on the moon, I find it rather odd that nearly all of them are almost perfect circles. I would think that a fair number of very irregularly-shaped objects would have struck the surface of the moon. Besides that, these are enormous craters and there are lots of them. We don't see enormous asteroids hitting the moon on a regular basis. And, no, I don't believe that the earth and moon are billions of years old.
But more than that, I find it utterly preposterous that the moon rotates exactly at the same rate as it revolves around the earth. What are the odds of that? They have to be synchronized to the second. Otherwise, even if it was a second or two off, over the course of years, decades, and centuries, the face of the moon would change. And then scientists allege the moon is getting slightly farther away each year. So I guess it also adjusts its speed of rotation to match.
Then there's the amazing coicidence that the sun is exactly 400x larger than the earth and, at the same time, exactly 400x farther away ... thus making eclipses possible. Of course, pay no attention that the distance between the earth and the sun can vary by about 4%, so why are there perfect eclipses year round.
Finally, what seals the deal for me is the non-movement of polaris. We are hurtling through space, allegedly, at nearly 2 million MPH, rotating, revolving, etc. If the earth's angle to polaris were to change even a little bit, just by a couple of degrees, then Polaris would have off center. Sure, they argue that Polaris is so far away that the angle doesn't change at all. But the entire solar system and the galaxy hurtle through space on such a flat plane that the angle between earth and Polaris never changes.
So you mean to tell me that with all this movement (as below), the angle of the earth's North Pole in relation to Polaris doesn't change regularly? Sorry, just not buying it.
Vortexes necessarily mean angle chages, depending on which side of the vortex you're flying around.