Then there is the global moon, which is also associated with the Virgin Mary, reflecting as it does the light of the sun, just as Mary reflects the light of her Son who is in Heaven. 

While a pius metaphor, the moon does not reflect the sun's light.

 ‘There is no room for doubt that Astronomy was invented at the beginning of the World. As there is nothing more noteworthy than the regularity of movement among these great luminous bodies that turn unceasingly around the Earth, it is natural to think that one of the first interests of men was to consider their course and observe their periods. But mere curiosity alone was not solely responsible for leading men to set themselves astronomical speculations, for it can be maintained that necessity as well obliged them. For should one not observe the seasons that vary by the movement of the Sun, it would be impossible to make a success of agriculture; were one to fail to note the suitable times for travel, one could establish no Business; should one not have determined once and for all the length of the month and the year, there could be neither order established between civil affairs, nor could days be marked out for religious purposes: hence as agricultural farming, commerce, politics and even religion cannot do without astronomy, it is obvious that men must have been obliged to study this science right from the World’s beginning. Both sacred and secular history confirms this truth. What the Holy Scriptures reveals about the years that the ancient Patriarchs lived up to is proof positive that the first men studied the movements of the stars. For had they not taken account of the exact number of days that last in the varying phases of the Moon which serve to conceal the months; and of the number of months during which the Sun little by little approaches the Zenith and afterwards distances itself from it, marking the changes by increase and diminution of the days, which allow one to establish the length of the year, they could not have noted the number of years each Patriarch had lived, nor the times of their birth and death, as precisely as Moses records it in Genesis. And there certainly was need in this first age of the world to observe the stars with a great deal of care, for by the circuмstances of the history of the great flooding which are also reported in Genesis, one can see that the year from the time of the Deluge was regulated following the movements of the Sun and Moon: which supposes a boundless number of observations. It is yet to be understood how all the application imaginable by the first men studying the sky could have gained them so much knowledge of the movements of the stars, unless their lives were longer than ours. By the living of such long lives gained for them great advances in astronomy. Flavius Josephus (37-100AD) was of the opinion that so necessary was this science that one of the reasons why God granted the first men such a long-lasting life was to facilitate for them the knowledge of the movements of the stars.’--- J.D. Cassini, The Progress of Astronomy

‘While Tyco de Brahe was observing in Denmark, many famous astronomers gathered in Rome under the aegis of Pope Gregory XIII. They worked with great success at correcting the errors that had crept in insensibly in the [Julian] calendar by the precession of Equinoxes and through anticipation of new Moons. These errors later would have completely overturned the order established by the Councils for the celebrations of movable feasts had the calendar not been revised according to modern observations of the movements of the Sun and of the Moon compared with the old times. It was Aloysius Lilius (1510-1576) who invented the new form of the Gregorian year but after his death Christoph Clavius (1538–1612) perfected it, gave its explanation, and its defence.’--- J.D. Cassini, The Progress of Astronomy

We don't know.  Best guess is that it's a plasma phenomenon excited by electrical currents in the atmosphere.

Unlike modern scientists, we admit when we don't know something, rather than make up a theory to back-justify our previous theories.

You can see THROUGH the part of the moon that isn't lit up ... as noted by several professional astronomers (and FEs have produced videos).  Professor Foster, in a video from the 1950s, said that he had undeniable evidence that the moon is made of plasma.  I believe that electromagnetism (rather than mythical "gravity") is actually behind many phenomena.  Tesla believed that eletricity was everywhere, that pressure from ether was responsible for "gravity", and that electro-magnetism could counteract the effects of gravity.  He had a design for an anti-gravity flying machine.  There are "electric universe" theories out there that seem to have a lot of support.  We just don't know, and that's partly due to the fact that modern science has sent everyone on a wild goose chase due to a need to justify their various athestically-motivated theories.

Tesla famously remarked that science has used mathematical equations to build up a fantasy-land cosmology, a house of cards that merely assumes various unproven foundational principles.  That's why we ended up, as Kaku famously stated, with a crisis in cosmology, where they're off by 10^38, and have had to make up things like "Dark Matter" to keep the whole thing afloat.

Unlike modern scientists, we admit when we don't know something, rather than make up a theory to back-justify our previous theories.

You can see THROUGH the part of the moon that isn't lit up ... as noted by several professional astronomers (and FEs have produced videos).  Professor Foster, in a video from the 1950s, said that he had undeniable evidence that the moon is made of plasma.  I believe that electromagnetism (rather than mythical "gravity") is actually behind many phenomena.  Tesla believed that eletricity was everywhere, that pressure from ether was responsible for "gravity", and that electro-magnetism could counteract the effects of gravity.  He had a design for an anti-gravity flying machine.  There are "electric universe" theories out there that seem to have a lot of support.  We just don't know, and that's partly due to the fact that modern science has sent everyone on a wild goose chase due to a need to justify their various athestically-motivated theories.

Tesla famously remarked that science has used mathematical equations to build up a fantasy-land cosmology, a house of cards that merely assumes various unproven foundational principles.  That's why we ended up, as Kaku famously stated, with a crisis in cosmology, where they're off by 10^38, and have had to make up things like "Dark Matter" to keep the whole thing afloat.

I always understood the light of the sun was reflected by the moon. I presume its phases were brought about by the blockage of the sun's light by the Earth as the moon rotated around the Earth.

That said your opinion on electromagnetism (rather than mythical "gravity") is correct. You do know that Einstein decided to extend his theory of gravity by attempting to combine it with the maths of electromagnetism. He knew if he could produce the equations then he could claim the greatest breakthrough in the history of physics, the long sought ‘Theory of Everything.’

Einstein worked on his UFT theory throughout the 1920s. Even when he fell ill he would do his maths on the sheets of his bed, or get the second wife to do them. In 1928 a rumour hit the newspapers that he was on the verge of the complete theory and was immediately lauded by journalists etc. Finally, on Jan. 30th, 1929 he published his five-page thesis. As we could imagine, such was his reputation that everyone first believed the man had evidence for the laws of the universe. Einstein boasted that he had solved the problems involved in writing down field equations for his simplified field theory, the long sought-after theory of everything, trying to show a link between his theory of gravity and electromagnetism. On the day the third of a series of nine articles on the theory was published, the New York Times printed an English translation of the lot, as ‘an outstanding advance in science.’  Soon however, this ‘science’ was found to be so full of contradictions that even the Relativists could not obscure its nonsense and Einstein had to abandon it. Accordingly, a year later Einstein knew the game was up and withdrew the paper in humiliation. That was to be the last of his theories in the field of cosmology.

Domenico Cassini's "And God said: Be light made. And light was made."

Such a connection between 'universal gravity' or (the movements of cosmic bodies in the universe) emerged when we learned that Cassinian ovals - the orbits Domenico Cassini found when measuring the sun and planets going around the earth, and the orbits of stars around the Earth according to stellar aberration, are also used for modelling electro-magnetic activity in the case of wires of equal current and direction or like-point charges.

This link can be demonstrated by spreading iron-filings over a 2 positive-pole magnetised surface. This will form directional charge patterns that constitute a whole series of Cassinian ovals. Thus Cassini proved cosmic movements are DIRECTLY related to electromagnetism. But because Cassini's findings were all related to God's astronomy and cosmology, they have been ignored for centuries.

In 1924 the scientist J. D. Main Smith’s book Chemistry & Atomic Structure was published. In it he made the following connection:

‘Electron orbits in free atoms are “one-eyed,” have a nucleus only at one focus of the orbit. Atoms however… are in another category, their electron orbits are “two-eyed,”… Obviously as such orbits have two foci of attracting nuclear charges, electrons cannot describe elliptic orbits nor yet circular orbits, both of which are characteristic of orbits with a single central force. Professor G. T. Morgan came to the conclusion some years ago that the closed curves, known to mathematicians as “ovals of Cassini,” which are “two-eyed,” might suffice to represent the orbits of shared electrons. The Cassinian system of curves is such that the product of the distances from the foci of a point on a curve is constant. Clerk Maxwell, in his Electricity and Magnetism, 1873, showed that the sections of equipotential surfaces about two equal charges were Cassinian ovals (diagram XX). It follows, therefore, that a Cassinian oval is an orbit of constant potential, and, consequently, a possible Bohr orbit for an electron.’ --- Chemistry & Atomic Structure, p.202. 


Moreover, in the 20th century a RADIATION called the Cosmic Microwave Background (CMB) was discovered throughout the universe. Is this the electromagnetic ‘light’ of creation revealed in Genesis? Didn't Sungenis and his team find that this CMB showed the Earth at the centre of the Universe.

We don't know.  Best guess is that it's a plasma phenomenon excited by electrical currents in the atmosphere.

Absurd!  I love it!

The moon is not plasma.  It is comprised of minerals.  That said, your references to an electric universe are more spot on.  There’s lots of evidence of plasma electric discharge on the moon’s rocky surface.  The craters are too round and perfect for them to be “impact” craters.  The “lava tubes” and “canals” also appear to be the results of rilling—an electrical phenomenon.


I’m very much enjoying the second guessing of the official narrative of 20th Century cosmology—even when I disagree with it.


And for the record, while I do think we’ve been on the moon, the official stories of our moon landings are, I believe, dubious.

Flat or globe, plasma moon or stone, we sure as hell never went to the moon

Laramie, I’m curious...if we’ve been to the moon, then why the need for the govt to lie about the moon landings?

The only people who I've seen push the "we've been there but the gov't is lying" theory are those who believe in aliens or believe Buzz Aldrin's lies