CathInfo.com

Just wanted to take, oh, 10 seconds, to refute Dankward's gratuitous assertion (delivered as always such authority) that all impact craters are round.  Here are just a couple from earth.

You'd have all kinds of things (in a wide variety of shapes) coming in from strange angles.  But instead (on the moon) we see this:


Perfect circles everywhere ... that also appear to be very shallow for impact craters.  These look more like bubbles in a liquid than they do impact craters.

I said that explosions tend to radially expand outwards as energy is quickly released, thus resulting in round impact craters. This was specifically about the moon, not about earth.

These are not all "perfect circles everywhere" on the moon either, as I already mentioned - just look closely without bias. Use an image editing software if you want to. Are you really looking at this and saying they are all perfect circles?

However the soft, light moon dust (regolith) is displaced much easier than the tight earth crust, thus tending to result in nice, round craters.

If you think this proves that the moon is "translucent plasma cheese" you're mistaken - we know the moon is a solid spherical object lit by the sun and only by the sun, we can actually bounce signals off it's surface (as has been done even by amateur radio operators since decades) and measure it's surface using radar, as well as perform spectroscopy on the light that bounces off of it.

You should really take into account more external, unbiased material on these topics instead of just picking what confirms your bias.

Radar image of the moon, that means not only light reaching it, but invisible electromagnetic waves hitting the moon and bouncing back:

Another interesting note is that God through Our Lady at Fatima even implicitly undermined the "errors of Russia" to come by moving and changing the Sun in in the sky, with even people in outlying areas witnessing the event. Which, to me, shows the Sun as a local body rather than a gargantuan ball of nuclear plasma in (((space)))

This is a really good point.  I haven't considered the Miracle of the Sun yet from the cosmology perspective.  I had always been puzzled by it, like how the earth could get that close to the sun without major things happening, but if the sun is more local, it could come just close enough to heat things up but not incinerate the planet.  I don't buy that the miracle was just a mass hypnosis of the crowds by God.

Another interesting note is that God through Our Lady at Fatima even implicitly undermined the "errors of Russia" to come by moving and changing the Sun in in the sky, with even people in outlying areas witnessing the event. Which, to me, shows the Sun as a local body rather than a gargantuan ball of nuclear plasma in (((space)))

The  problem with this miracle is that it was confined to a place in Portugal. If the sun was physically moved, all in the daylight hours on Earth would have seen its effects. This did not happen.