Following from the 1st proof given here https://www.cathinfo.com/the-earth-god-made-flat-earth-geocentrism/1st-proof-of-the-flat-earth-lasers-and-levels/

I give the 2nd proof of the flat earth...


Objects beyond the horizon
 (from flatearthtrads.com)





Objects beyond the horizon

Both flat earthers and round earthers agree on the circuмference of the earth, approximately 25,000 miles.

​

 If those 25000 miles form a ball, as we see in the NASA photos, then there must be a fixed rate at which it curves.

 

That rate of curvature is 8 inches per mile squared. This means that after the first mile it drops by 8 inches, the second 32, the third 6 feet, all the way down to 1.8 miles of a drop after 120 miles distance.

If the earth is a ball, then after a certain point looking straight out over the horizon, objects should start to disappear the further they go away.

 

In fact, we can calculate exactly when they should be beyond visibility, with various "earth curve calculators" available online, provided by people who have nothing to do with the flat earth.

​

 The problem for globe earthers is that there are consistently objects visible that should not be visible. Historically, we have many examples of this, but closer to our day, with advances in widely available camera technology, people can see for themselves examples of this.




Here below we show snapshots of one of the best produced videos showing islands off the coast of California.

​

 The photo is taken from over 30 miles away. With height of the camera there should be over 580 feet below the horizon.

​

The small islands should be completely gone and most of the large one, yet this is not what we see


















We'll let the video makers speak for themselves...




Note also how steady and integral the picture is. This is important against those who try to claim that it is a mirage, or some kind of refraction.

 

If not upside down, a refracted image would not present itself with the same integrity and steadiness. The video shows this even better. (included below)

​

There are many more examples of this. You are encouraged to go to this link :

http://flatearthtrads.forumga.net/t17-objects-over-the-horizon-proofs

In the first two lines of my post. The link I gave.

False premise:

1. the Earth isn't a sphere.

If you're going to be precise then be precise, including your representations of opposing views; while this seems to be a challenge for some, you can still try.

If you've already factored this in, then please clearly link such.

What does your comment have to do with the O.P.? Did you even read the O.P.?

Blessed Mother says the earth is a globe, did you ever read how she described the earth and designed the miraculous medal?

Not a premise, but a conclusion based on facts you wish to ignore. If 2+2=4 then why represent an opposing view that 2+2=5 (such as a ball earth)?

For crying out loud you can't even see that it not only can be,  but is, both.

Carry on question begging though; that's how ya'll roll 9/10 times.

The Vandenberg launch last month was filmed y a news cchopper in Phoenix,  400 nm away.

That would not be possible if earth were a globe. 

But, unsurprisingly not one glober responded. They would not touch it with a ten foot pole.

Did you read the O.P., Myrna?

You know Meg, Scripture says to knock, seek and God will answer.  Notice many of the globally indoctrinated REFUSE to ask, seek, knock or learn anything they don't already think they know. You're right, they are not reading our posts, except to find fault in some aspect of them long enough to respond.  Hence, the tendency to miss the point of any given post which they do almost always.  Once in a while someone will ask how something might work.  That person must actually be reading.  A commendable thing to do before responding.  

So much for Neil's moon proof.  Super short video proves earth's shadow doesn't cause eclipses.