Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: "The Heliocentric Hoax" (by Fr. Robinson's stepfather)  (Read 57889 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Re: "The Heliocentric Hoax" (by Fr. Robinson's stepfather)
« Reply #215 on: July 24, 2018, 08:18:39 AM »
.
"Shall not be moved" in the Bible means "Shall not be shaken".  This proves nothing about Astronomy.  
And you can repeat that one thousand times, but it still proves nothing about Astronomy.  So, you
are WRONG.  You keep repeating the same LIE (that this proves something about Astronomy) over
and over and over again.  That's why I called you a bad name.   So go ahead and just keep repeating
it over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over.
Scripture says it in different ways so someone is selling you a line.  

1 Chronicles 16:20 Let all the earth be moved at his presence : for he hath founded the world immoveable. 
Psalm 104:5 5Who hast founded the earth upon its own bases: it shall not be moved for ever and ever.


Re: "The Heliocentric Hoax" (by Fr. Robinson's stepfather)
« Reply #216 on: July 24, 2018, 08:41:30 AM »
Scripture says it in different ways so someone is selling you a line.  
1 Chronicles 16:20 Let all the earth be moved at his presence : for he hath founded the world immoveable.
Psalm 104:5 5Who hast founded the earth upon its own bases: it shall not be moved for ever and ever..
.
You can substitute the word "shaken" in every place where the word "moved" is used and it makes sense.
You cannot substitute the word "rotating" or "orbiting" in place of the word "moved" and still have it make sense.
I have already said this several times.  

The earth is rotating once every 24 hours.  That is why the Sun appears to go "up" and "down".
If you are sitting on a spinning merry-go-round in the park, is the park going round and round?
No.  Therefore the Sun is not going "up" and "down".  The Earth is rotating.  It is physically impossible
for the Sun to orbit the Earth.  

You don't want to go beyond the word "moved", so I can't prove anything to you about Astronomy.  
Have you ever studied Astronomy?  Do you know anything about Celestial Mechanics?  Do you even know
why the Moon stays in orbit (instead of flying off into space)?

You always avoid these questions about the physical world and just repeat, blah, blah, blah "moved" blah, blah.
Question.  Where are the "bases"?  I would like to see a photo of the "bases".

Your brain is still in 500 BC.

I wonder if anybody else is reading this topic anymore.


Re: "The Heliocentric Hoax" (by Fr. Robinson's stepfather)
« Reply #217 on: July 24, 2018, 08:54:35 AM »
.
You can substitute the word "shaken" in every place where the word "moved" is used and it makes sense.
You cannot substitute the word "rotating" or "orbiting" in place of the word "moved" and still have it make sense.
I have already said this several times.  

The earth is rotating once every 24 hours.  That is why the Sun appears to go "up" and "down".
If you are sitting on a spinning merry-go-round in the park, is the park going round and round?
No.  Therefore the Sun is not going "up" and "down".  The Earth is rotating.  It is physically impossible
for the Sun to orbit the Earth.  

You don't want to go beyond the word "moved", so I can't prove anything to you about Astronomy.  
Have you ever studied Astronomy?  Do you know anything about Celestial Mechanics?  Do you even know
why the Moon stays in orbit (instead of flying off into space)?

You always avoid these questions about the physical world and just repeat, blah, blah, blah "moved" blah, blah.
Question.  Where are the "bases"?  I would like to see a photo of the "bases".

Your brain is still in 500 BC.

I wonder if anybody else is reading this topic anymore.
Modernism: modern artistic or literary philosophy and practice; especially : a self-conscious break with the past and a search for new forms of expression

The Fathers of the Church have already expounded on creation.  Redefining terms changes nothing in reality, except to confuse yourself and others for using a modernist mindset.  Scripture is so clear the Church condemned Galileo based on it. 

Re: "The Heliocentric Hoax" (by Fr. Robinson's stepfather)
« Reply #218 on: July 24, 2018, 09:04:54 AM »
Psalms 104:5

He set the earth on its foundations, so that it should never be moved.
He set the earth on its foundations, never to be moved.
He set the earth on its foundations; it can never be moved.

Above are just a few different translations of this Scriptural passage.  If the word "moved" means "shaken", then Scripture denies the existence of earthquakes.  




Offline Matthew

  • Mod
Re: "The Heliocentric Hoax" (by Fr. Robinson's stepfather)
« Reply #219 on: July 24, 2018, 09:25:30 AM »
Happenby:

Have you ever read Pascendi? That's St. Pius X's encyclical on Modernism. If not, please stop talking about what you don't understand.
Apollo (and anyone else on CI) is not guilty of Modernism. You haven't studied it, so what would you know?

You just gave the definition of "modernism" with a lowercase "m", as it applies to artistic and cultural endeavors. That isn't the same thing as Modernism, the synthesis of all heresies, which is like acid to the Catholic Faith, caused the Crisis in the Church, and caused Vatican II to be a disaster.

I'd love to hear you define Modernism in your own words, in particular how it caused the Crisis in the Church. I'd alternate between groaning and laughing.

Spend more time reading and learning and less time trying to be a teacher of men.

Start with the Epistles of St. Paul, particularly the part where he speaks to women.