I'll start a new thread. I have been sitting on some quotes from Saint and Doctor, St. John Damascene. It's fairly relevant to your assertion above.
As of yesterday
ca. noon (EDT), there were already
205 topics here in this
flattist ghetto.
I beg you to please consider whether this flattist ghetto needs yet another
topic. Yet another
topic here which, no matter how carefully you attempt to focus its discussion/debates by creating it with a
clearly phrased Subject [
†], will most likely collapse into
yet another free-for-all ignoring that
Subject, and shovelling in so much of the flattist
[expletives deleted] that've caused readers'
eyes to
glaze over, again & again. Meanwhile, new discussion/debates that are dead-center
on-topic will be posted into other practically random
topic. Which will stimulate spherist responses that were already adequate rebuttals in whatever
topics they were initially posted, but where they were of course rejected on axiomatic grounds
a priori by the flattists [
×].
I don't intend herein to pick on any
CathInfo member in particular, but I can't overlook such a well-timed hook for my protest. It
does apply to all members. So yes, I was already exasperated with 'Neil Obstat' when he started this very
topic earlier this week.
-------
Note †: E.g., The highly relevant
topic on the 1893
encyclical letter by Pope Leo XIII:
Proventissimus Deus. An encyclical whose meaning is still being debated late this week, but the tightly-focused
topic has fallen thro' lack of use (i.e., not since "February 11, 2018, 23:52:36 (CDT)") to near the bottom of this subforum's
index-page 4.
Note ×: E.g., "Why can't you globists show me even 1 convincing photo of your 'blue-marble' globe?
Oh! But of course, I refuse (
a priori) to accept any images from any national or supranational
space agencies, because they are all
demonic."