Will Mankind Be Extinct In a Few Years?

According to a new book by Dr Shanna Shaw, Count Down, the male sperm count in Western industrial countries is falling at a dramatic rate. Shaw estimates that, over the past four decades, the average sperm count has dropped by 50% or more. Shaw estimates that, unless toxic chemical exposures in agriculture and the environment are dramatically curtailed, we may not have the ability to reproduce naturally much longer and, by 2050, most humans in the industrial countries, including China, will need technological assistance to procreate. Swan believes the cause is due to the rise in toxic chemical exposures, including phthalates (chemicals that make plastics soft), Bisphenol A (which make plastics hard), flame retardants, Teflon, and many others. Agricultural pesticides also are cited as a major problem primarily because they get into groundwater and the food chain. The pesticide Azatrine, widely used on US corn crops and sugarcane, is a potent endocrine disruptor. A study of its effects on frogs showed that it blocks sperm production in three-quarters of male frogs and turns one in 10 into females. Glyphosate, the active ingredient in Roundup, the world’s most widely used pesticide, is linked to birth defects, reproductive problems, and liver disease. Since all these effects are well known, one can only wonder if use of these chemicals is allowed by governments as part of a planned depopulation agenda. If so, it is working. -GEG
It’s no secret that Bill Gates and the advocates of the UN Sustainable Development Agenda 2030 are also devout promoters of human eugenics, the “thinning of the Human Herd” as Britain’s misanthropic Prince Philip once put it. Some such as Joachim Schnellnhuber, climate adviser to the Pope, openly welcome a human population below one billion as “sustainable.” Now serious research is emerging that one of the most effective reducers of the human population is being spread by so-called “modern scientific agriculture” through the select use of toxic agrochemicals, pesticides deemed safe which are anything but safe.
According to a new book by Dr Shanna Shaw, Count Down, the male sperm count in Western industrial countries, including the EU and USA, is falling at a dramatic rate. Shaw estimates that over the past four decades the average sperm count has dropped by 50% or more. In other words a young male today seeking to have a family has only half the sperm count his grandfather did, half the chance to conceive. Shaw estimates that unless toxic chemical exposures in agriculture and the environment are dramatically altered, we may not have the ability to reproduce naturally much longer, and that by 2050 most human beings in the industrial countries, including China, will need technological assistance to procreate.
Shaw’s book is a further elaboration of a 2017 peer-reviewed scientific paper which Shaw and colleagues published. In the paper, Shaw carefully analyzed a total of 244 estimates of Sperm Concentration and Total Sperm Count (TSC) from 185 studies of 42 935 men who provided semen samples in 1973–2011. What they found was alarming to the extreme. But beyond a few media headlines, no changes of consequence resulted, as the powerful agrochemical corporations such as Bayer-Monsanto, Syngenta, DowDuPont (now Corteva) lobbied regulators to ignore the findings.
Read full article here…

https://journal-neo.org/2021/03/09/will-mankind-be-extinct-in-a-few-years/

I was listening to a podcast about this recently. I don't exactly know how the science here works, but apparently the lower the sperm count, the less likely it is for conception? I guess that's the basic idea?
.
Well, apparently these numbers have been falling for decades, and if trends continue, in another 40-50 years the average sperm count will be so low that it will be very hard for people to have children.
.
This is obviously a long timeline, but the numbers are disturbing because they keep going down steadily and show no signs of reversal.
.
Then again, people are voluntarily using contraception at such a high rate that they are already producing the same effect even faster, so I'm not sure how much practical difference this will even make. Again, if current trends continue, by the time it becomes difficult for people to conceive, nobody will want to anyway. Scary stuff.
.
But of course, as Matthew said, all this has to be considered from a theological point of view. The human race will last until the end of the world, and it will be destroyed by end of the world, not by underpopulation or any other natural cause.
.
But what is interesting is that, if these trends are true and correct, they can certainly give us a deadline for when to expect the end of the world. Not by giving us a definite time to expect it, but so that we can say, "There is strong scientific evidence that the human race will not last another century, so the world will probably end within that time period." What a frightening thing to say.

That's easy --

A definite, surefire, Catholic dogma-based answer: NO.

Apologies for taking that young child-quality CLICKBAIT title seriously.

We haven't had the Antichrist yet, so the End of Time can't happen in 3 years.

The Antichrist will reign for 3 1/3 years. Not to mention countless Catholic prophecy that foretells a Chastisement before that, a short period of peace, then a deeper plunge into evil that will make today look like the Garden of Eden. "The corruption of the best is the worst."

Not to mention, that even if the LAST BABY ON EARTH was born tomorrow, mankind wouldn't be "extinct" in "a few years". It would take decades for mankind to die out. Look up the meaning of "extinct". It doesn't mean doomed, writing's on the wall, or on-the-decline.

Not to mention the Great Catholic Monarch. Even if the Antichrist got started today, where would the GCM fit in? Don't tell me he already came, but he didn't do anything at all! Who would suggest that the GCM lived among us low-key: he lived with his mother, looked like a homeless man, started several Social Media accounts, and paid shady individuals to artificially boost traffic to those accounts.

Precisely. Just because someone has the title "Doctor" in front of them doesn't mean they're credible. One of the worst musicians I've ever worked with had a doctorate.