Author Topic: Three Days of Darkness (Read 36873 times)

Matthew · « **Reply #15 on:** January 17, 2011, 10:14:54 AM »

Monsanto is causing malnutrition, suffering, and death in more people today than the nαzιs ever did.

Did the nαzιs control the world's food supply? No.
Is Monsanto on track to achieve this? Yes.

Who's the real embodiment of evil? Which of the two makes me tremble more? Monsanto.

I'm sure Hitler encouraged the Germans to have gardens, to help the Fatherland and the war effort.

Matthew

Matthew · « **Reply #16 on:** January 17, 2011, 04:16:10 PM »

I'm sorry you've been so thoroughly brainwashed, "Stinko", but the fact is that you have been brainwashed.

If evil took on a body, it would certainly be much, much worse than Hitler, and if you believe otherwise you've been watching far too much Jєωιѕн propaganda.

If you can't imagine where Hitler would "fall short" in a hypothetical contest of "Most Evil Man of All Time", you have a pathetic imagination.

I've read some history, and encountered many more horrifying people and situations than those of the 20th century. Even if you believe the official "h0Ɩ0cαųst" propaganda numbers of how many were killed by the nαzιs (six million), that alleged genocide wouldn't even place in the top ten!

It just shows how narrow your experience is.

Matthew

Matthew · « **Reply #17 on:** January 17, 2011, 05:34:57 PM »

Apparently Stinko thinks he is the Supreme Pontiff.

I guess nothing should surprise me anymore, after running CathInfo for 4 1/2 years...

Emerentiana · « **Reply #18 on:** January 17, 2011, 05:50:37 PM »

Quote from: SpiritusSanctus

Quote from: Riddlesnthdrk
Spiritus is right... I personally think the 3 days of darkness will be the chasitisment of the world..refered to in the appocolypse, stinko. I think after the rull of the anti-christ, 7 years is it? That is when God will step in and chasitise humanity. Why would there be a chasitisment before the anti-christ is to appear?

Actually the three days of darkness comes before the Anti-Christ. This is because the world is already in bad shape. You don't think God would allow the Anti-Christ to come now when it's already this bad do you? Then the Anti-Christ will come, then he will be defeated by Christ and then the world will end. This, of course, will mark the second coming of Christ.

Sipiritus, this is a much better explination.
The Catholic alive today are certainly in no shape to perservere during the reign of Antichrist.
Many prophecies refer to the Chastisement followed by a period of Peace and then the antichrist. This period of peace is referred to by many as the reign of Mary.
Blessed Anna Maria Taigi mentions Antichrist living thru the chastisement.
The chastisement is a mystery, but maybe linked to the sun. The miracle of the Sun at Fatima was a clue.

Belloc · « **Reply #19 on:** January 18, 2011, 08:53:02 AM »

Quote from: stinko

Mention of 'three days of darkness' is not found in the Bible.

countless times we hear of prophets sent and God punishing people.....why not now?

FYI oh banned member, Catholcis are NOT sola scrips...

Belloc · « **Reply #20 on:** January 18, 2011, 08:56:00 AM »

Quote from: stinko

Hitler was the Antichrist and the 'chastisement' has been going on for almost a century, obvious to anyone paying attention. Two world wars and sixty million dead, the Cold War and worldwide strife and a hundred million dead, now worldwide famine and then pestilence and who knows how many will die...just how much chastisement were you hoping for?

Protestant silliness-the always think the next bad guy is THE antichrist.....like Hitler, Stalin, Ahemnjebad (the Iranian fellow) and whatever movements going on at the time.....

they throw out the Fathers,etc and have no guide but fanciful hysteria (and selling a few books! )

Belloc · « **Reply #21 on:** January 18, 2011, 08:57:33 AM »

Hitler, Stalin,etc are types of antichrist-as were the OT leaders like Antiochus Ep in Machabees.....Moses, David,etc are types of CHrist.....

Matthew · « **Reply #22 on:** January 18, 2011, 09:36:07 AM »

Some people asked why Stinko got banned. I actually had several reasons. In short, he didn't belong here.

I just deleted his ignores -- all 53 of them! I only had one other (banned) member ignore that many people. For all I know, Stinko and he are the same person!

(No, this ISN'T a warning to all you who are ignoring people. I wouldn't ban someone just because they're ignoring 30 or 40 people.)

Anyone who ignores THAT many people (of all stripes) is likely a contrarian, annoying brat who doesn't belong here.

His posts were childish, ignorant, etc. and he seemed to be borderline Protestant with his "sola scriptura" bent.

Matthew

Belloc · « **Reply #23 on:** January 18, 2011, 09:48:08 AM »

:applause: :applause:

ServusSpiritusSancti · « **Reply #24 on:** January 18, 2011, 04:56:51 PM »

Quote from: Matthew

Some people asked why Stinko got banned. I actually had several reasons. In short, he didn't belong here.

I just deleted his ignores -- all 53 of them! I only had one other (banned) member ignore that many people. For all I know, Stinko and he are the same person!

(No, this ISN'T a warning to all you who are ignoring people. I wouldn't ban someone just because they're ignoring 30 or 40 people.)

Anyone who ignores THAT many people (of all stripes) is likely a contrarian, annoying brat who doesn't belong here.

His posts were childish, ignorant, etc. and he seemed to be borderline Protestant with his "sola scriptura" bent.

Matthew

I agree with that. I had a slight hunch that he might not be Traditional when he first signed up here (most Traditionalists here chose either religious screen-names or just use their own name rather than using some crazy screen-name like stinko), and after seeing his posts it is rather apparent that he does not have enough knowledge about religion to be posting here. Him being banned and having ignored 53 people must explain why I suddenly have only 1 igonre instead of 2 like I did yesterday.

chaz89 · « **Reply #25 on:** January 18, 2011, 05:37:02 PM »

Quote from: Matthew

Some people asked why Stinko got banned. I actually had several reasons. In short, he didn't belong here.

I just deleted his ignores -- all 53 of them! I only had one other (banned) member ignore that many people. For all I know, Stinko and he are the same person!

(No, this ISN'T a warning to all you who are ignoring people. I wouldn't ban someone just because they're ignoring 30 or 40 people.)

Anyone who ignores THAT many people (of all stripes) is likely a contrarian, annoying brat who doesn't belong here.

His posts were childish, ignorant, etc. and he seemed to be borderline Protestant with his "sola scriptura" bent.

Matthew

Not that it matters now, but I had a feeling he has been posting at another catholic forum with the screen name of "dominion". Same type of MO. Looks like he has a penchant for getting banned often. I ain't surprised!

MyrnaM · « **Reply #26 on:** January 18, 2011, 06:02:06 PM »

Quote from: SpiritusSanctus

Quote from: Matthew
Some people asked why Stinko got banned. I actually had several reasons. In short, he didn't belong here.

I just deleted his ignores -- all 53 of them! I only had one other (banned) member ignore that many people. For all I know, Stinko and he are the same person!

(No, this ISN'T a warning to all you who are ignoring people. I wouldn't ban someone just because they're ignoring 30 or 40 people.)

Anyone who ignores THAT many people (of all stripes) is likely a contrarian, annoying brat who doesn't belong here.

His posts were childish, ignorant, etc. and he seemed to be borderline Protestant with his "sola scriptura" bent.

Matthew

I agree with that. I had a slight hunch that he might not be Traditional when he first signed up here (most Traditionalists here chose either religious screen-names or just use their own name rather than using some crazy screen-name like stinko), and after seeing his posts it is rather apparent that he does not have enough knowledge about religion to be posting here. Him being banned and having ignored 53 people must explain why I suddenly have only 1 igonre instead of 2 like I did yesterday.

:roll-laugh1:

Funny too, that some want to ignore so many people, who are they posting to when they do that. Talking to themself, I suppose.

ServusSpiritusSancti · « **Reply #27 on:** January 19, 2011, 02:14:55 PM »

Quote from: MyrnaM

Quote from: SpiritusSanctus
Quote from: Matthew
Some people asked why Stinko got banned. I actually had several reasons. In short, he didn't belong here.

I just deleted his ignores -- all 53 of them! I only had one other (banned) member ignore that many people. For all I know, Stinko and he are the same person!

(No, this ISN'T a warning to all you who are ignoring people. I wouldn't ban someone just because they're ignoring 30 or 40 people.)

Anyone who ignores THAT many people (of all stripes) is likely a contrarian, annoying brat who doesn't belong here.

His posts were childish, ignorant, etc. and he seemed to be borderline Protestant with his "sola scriptura" bent.

Matthew

I agree with that. I had a slight hunch that he might not be Traditional when he first signed up here (most Traditionalists here chose either religious screen-names or just use their own name rather than using some crazy screen-name like stinko), and after seeing his posts it is rather apparent that he does not have enough knowledge about religion to be posting here. Him being banned and having ignored 53 people must explain why I suddenly have only 1 igonre instead of 2 like I did yesterday.

:roll-laugh1:

Funny too, that some want to ignore so many people, who are they posting to when they do that. Talking to themself, I suppose.

You've got a point there. Why igonre everyone and continue to post if you aren't going to get any replies? I guess he just wanted to make a statement and not have to worry about anyone telling him what he just said was insane.

Matthew · « **Reply #28 on:** January 19, 2011, 02:30:01 PM »

By the way, Dominion was banned from *this* forum as well.
He might have been the first guy with the 65 ignores, for all I know. I can't remember.

Here are some "gems" from Dominion:

Quote

I'm neither seventh-day adventist nor protestant. Should I order some wheelchairs for the feeble?

...

But when did Christ actually say or in any way indicate that the Sabbath should change? Or is this just Rome being Rome again?

ServusSpiritusSancti · « **Reply #29 on:** January 20, 2011, 04:06:21 PM »

Quote from: Matthew

By the way, Dominion was banned from *this* forum as well.
He might have been the first guy with the 65 ignores, for all I know. I can't remember.

Here are some "gems" from Dominion:
Quote

I'm neither seventh-day adventist nor protestant. Should I order some wheelchairs for the feeble?

...

But when did Christ actually say or in any way indicate that the Sabbath should change? Or is this just Rome being Rome again?

Yeah, I saw both of those posts from him. No knowledge on religion describes his posts.