CathInfo.com

The stated purpose of their coverage is to protect their insured, me. Their stated purpose is not to overturn unconstitutional law.

If faced with violating an unconstitutional law, your choices are (1) defend yourself within the bounds of said unconstitutional law--which may be difficult if your behavior meets the elements of the statute and you are in fact "guilty' by the letter of said unconstitutional law, or (2) get the law overturned as unconstitutional. Sometimes (read: oftentimes) the laws, especially those related to firearms and/or personal defense, are unconstitutional, leaving otherwise protected behavior (especially under natural law) as criminal behavior.

And that doesn't even begin to address civil law.

Buy Your Gun Yet?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tGAOiHRVpw0&feature=youtu.be 

It’s the lie that will not die.
‘Whites are doing mass shootings and must be stopped.’
Last time I looked it was blacks such as DeWayne Craddock who cut down 12 mostly white co-workers in Virginia Beach this summer.
He didn’t fit the script—he wasn’t white, no manifestos, no social media—so the jew-owned media ditched him.
There’s Anthony Watkins and Terrance Wesley who mowed down 5 black men in St Louis this July.
Never reached the jew-owned media desks.
‘Black Lives’ don’t matter to jews unless the shooter can be spun as a “white extremist.”
Then there’s Gary Martin who zapped 5 co-workers and wounded 5 cops in Illinois last February.
The story vanished.
‘Cop Lives’ don’t matter to Jєωιѕн spin-masters either whenever ‘white supremacists’ aren’t in the mix.
It’s not about guns, it’s a moral issue, but jews have mutilated morality by unseating Christian culture.
With traditional mores phased out it’s about displacing the white race.
And jews are shepherding the outplacement.
Take Google, (where compelling evidence points to Israel ownership), and do a search.
Type in:
“White American Doctors,” and voila! they don’t look too white to me.
Then the New York Times chimes in with, “We Have A White Nationalist Terrorist Problem,” followed by another OpEd:
“Right-wing extremist violence is our biggest threat, the numbers don’t lie.”
But jews do lie.
Seventy five percent of mass shootings are done by blacks and if this doesn’t tell the story then we’ve got a cast of Jєωιѕн journalists who will relentlessly dis-esteem white achievement.
No sooner than we were told that a “white nationalist” with a “manifesto” in El Paso did the shooting—(Dayton’s already been ‘memory-holed’ since the shooter was a registered Democrat who supported Elizabeth Warren)—then Schumer sticks his shnoz into the gun control cause.
[Clip: “New York Senator Chuck Schumer is calling on Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell to push gun legislation through the Senate that would close loopholes on background checks and assault weapons.” “It’s been 150 days since the House passed its legislation. And 14,000 people, 14,000, have died as a result of gun violence since the House passed the bill. Leader McConnell, do the right thing. Call an emergency session, and maybe we can do something to begin dealing with gun laws in a rational way.”]
Nothing “rational” about it but a cover for creeping communism (notice Schumer said “begin”) where only criminals, cops, and jews, who control Capitol Hill, will have guns.
Jews may not know how to use them but they sure want to take them.
Why do they fear an armed population? Doesn’t that protect the country from foreign invasion, like against Jewry’s ‘hated Russians?’
Yet attack words are fired off now in rapid succession:
“White extremism,” “white nationalism,” “white supremacist terror.”
There’s no end to this Jєωιѕн s-h-i-t.
[Clip: “White Supremacist Terror. Those are words the President has yet to use to describe the attack in El Paso over the weekend that killed 20 people, an Anglo man, as the sheriff in El Paso said, who drove 10 hours to kill Hispanics. The President has used the words neither “white supremacists” nor “terror.” What is the impact? Joining me now is Jonathan Greenblatt. He is the CEO of the Anti-Defamation League. And Jonathan, it’s very nice having you this morning. As I was saying as you were walking on, someday we’ll get to talk in a different situation where it isn’t quite so painful.What do you think the President has to say this morning? Do you think he needs to call this attack “white supremacist terror?”
 “Yes. I think there’s a few things, Jon, we need to think about today. First and foremost, our hearts ache for the victims in El Paso as well as those in Dayton, so we need to keep those people centered in front of our minds. I think secondly, as we talk about the President, keep in mind that today is the anniversary of the 2012 attack in Oak Creek, Wisconsin, where a man, a white supremacist, burst into a Sikh temple and murdered six worshipers, right? So white nationalism, violent extremism, it existed before President Trump and yet words have consequences. And so it’s not even what he says today at 10 o’clock although there’s something he needs to say is that white supremacy is a global terror threat, but it’s what he says afterwards.”]
Yeah, like letting Greenblatt and his odious ilk monitor every word we say until it passes the Jєωιѕн ‘hate speech’ test.
Nothing Trump can say or “say afterwards” will be good enough for the yids until they throw a legal search warrant down everyone’s throat.
It’s not about guns, it’s about cutting down the white race, the only ‘bloc’ that can resist Jєωιѕн supremacy.
Buy your gun yet?
Go ahead, buy three.
But once the white race is displaced, they’ll be no better than barking up a tree.