https://meramo.net/ewExternalFiles/frletriom.pdf
GOOGLE translation from a French essay...?
By Fr. Basilio Méramo
March 17, 2008 AD. 
"...
If things were to continue this way, no one would be able to remain standing. Not even the faithful who resist heroically and remain firm in the Faith of all time, in the Catholic Tradition. All would succuмb, as many have already succuмbed. It is useless to name names. The facts are there, before our eyes. This crisis of faith, with the entire revolutionary wave of self-destruction of the Church, cannot fail to be apocalyptic. Otherwise, we fall into absurdity, and one would have to be ignorant or, worse still, imbecile not to see it. No one humanly can now remedy it. Only divine intervention can. To think otherwise is to fall into the temptation of Progressivism, if we look closely. Indeed, for Progressivism, solutions are obtained solely through intrahistorical and human forces.  This is why
history evolves dialectically toward the good, providing (through human labor, and technically, to boot) all the solutions that establish human well-being and happiness on this earth, conceived as the Earthly Paradise. This idea is promoted by both
Communism and Capitalism. Both seek happiness on this earth and work toward the realization of paradise on this earth, without divisive dogmas. From this follows
2
the fact that they merge. Communism and Capitalism merge into a technolater socialist democracy.

"Capitalism and Communism, however different they may appear, are fundamentally
united. Let's say that both fundamentally seek to achieve the Earthly Paradise through technology.  Their 'mysticism' is a technolatrous and anthropolatrous messianism" P. Castellani (el Apokalypsis de San Juan – Ed. Paulinas – Buenos Aires 1963 p. 347)
This is where the powers of this world come from
"which favor the amalgamation of Capitalism and Communism, which will lead to
the advent of the Antichrist" (Ibid p. 184)
Perhaps this perverse fusion could have been avoided if, in due time, Russia had been
consecrated to the Immaculate Heart of Mary. This would have resulted in a worthy eminence of divine intervention in favor of the exaltation of the Mother of God as a preamble to her
definitive triumph.
But since God's request has not been granted, we should not be surprised
by the current state of affairs. In a profound vision, Father Castellani announces:
"Modernism will unite the two;  It will merge them into a religious magma. Modernism is the common ground of the two opposing heresies, which one day—now near—will encompass them under the influence of the Pseudo-Prophet" (The Journals of Benjamin Benavides - Ed. Dictio - Buenos Aires 1978 p. 45)
Isn't this what we see now? And by dint of seeing it, we come to find it almost normal, banal to the point that we fail to fully appreciate the gravity of the situation and seek to cure AIDS with aspirin. And all this under a veneer of pity and devotion, in the false illusion of a restoration through the triumph of Mary out of context. For this context is apocalyptic and intended to come after the Parousia and not before it.  Before, it could have given a certain peace, entirely relative, like a pledge, as a prelude to the definitive, total, and universal Triumph of the Immaculate Heart of Mary. But this triumph can never be separated—any more than it was on the Cross—from the Sacred Heart of Her Divine Son. The Triumph of the Immaculate Heart of Mary is the Triumph of the Sacred Heart of Jesus. It is the Triumph of the Sacred Hearts of Jesus and Mary. It is the Triumph of Christ the King and Mary the Queen. This triumph can be neither fleeting, nor relative, nor partial. It must be total, universal, and complete, thus fulfilling the great promise: one flock under one shepherd. An aspiration that consciously or unconsciously makes the hearts of men and of all humanity beat.  But the great danger and the great temptation is to want a fulfillment within
history, within..."

*****
Want more of this 7 page essay, "The Triumph of the Immaculate Heart of Mary",? sounds ok.. We aren't theologians